Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37249592›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society2024

Maturation of trauma systems in Europe.

Samantha Scharringa, Suzan Dijkink, Pieta Krijnen, Inger B Schipper

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Short-term impact of preinjury antithrombotic therapy on outcomes in older trauma patients.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Adult trauma centers in Poland: where do we stand?International journal of emergency medicine · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Trauma systems: a global comparison.OTA international : the open access journal of orthopaedic trauma · 2025
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Samantha ScharringaDepartment of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands. s.a.scharringa@umail.leidenuniv.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0920-2632
Suzan DijkinkDepartment of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8191-4247
Pieta KrijnenDepartment of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7154-9514
Inger B SchipperDepartment of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9952-3079

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo provide an overview of trauma system maturation in Europe.

methodsMaturation was assessed using a self-evaluation survey on prehospital care, facility-based trauma care, education/training, and quality assurance (scoring range 3-9 for each topic), and key infrastructure elements (scoring range 7-14) that was sent to 117 surgeons involved in trauma, orthopedics, and emergency surgery, from 24 European countries. Average scores per topic were summed to create a total score on a scale from 19 to 50 per country. Scores were compared between countries and between geographical regions, and correlations between scores on different sections were assessed.

resultsThe response rate was 95%. On the scale ranging from 19 to 50, the mean (SD, range) European trauma system maturity score was 38.5 (5.6, 28.2-48.0). Prehospital care had the highest mean score of 8.2 (0.5, 6.9-9.0); quality assurance scored the lowest 5.9 (1.7, 3.2-8.5). Facility-based trauma care was valued 6.9 (1.4, 4.1-9.0), education and training 7.0 (1.2, 5.2-9.0), and key infrastructure elements 10.3 (1.6, 7.6-13.5). All aspects of trauma care maturation were strongly correlated (r > 0.6) except prehospital care. End scores of Northern countries scored significantly better than Southern countries (p = 0.03).

conclusionThe level of development of trauma care systems in Europe varies greatly. Substantial improvements in trauma systems in several European countries are still to be made, especially regarding quality assurance and key infrastructure elements, such as implementation of a lead agency to oversee the trauma system, and funding for growth, innovation and research.

Indexed as

Emergency Medical ServicesTrauma CentersEuropeHumansQuality Assurance, Health CareSurveys and QuestionnairesTraumatologyWounds and InjuriesDevelopmentEuropeMaturationTraumaTrauma centersTrauma systems

Identifiers

PMID37249592
PMCPMC10227384

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.