Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37249384›Full record

ArticleRevista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P2023

Elaboration of a nursing record standard for an Emergency Care Unit.

Dilzilene Cunha Sivirino Farias, Eliane de Fátima Almeida Lima, Karla de Melo Batista, Marcia Regina Cubas, Júlia Valéria de Oliveira Vargas Bitencourt, Cândida Caniçali Primo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Dilzilene Cunha Sivirino FariasUniversidade Federal do Espírito Santo, Vitória, ES. Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7408-1988
Eliane de Fátima Almeida LimaUniversidade Federal do Espírito Santo, Vitória, ES. Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5128-3715
Karla de Melo BatistaUniversidade Federal do Espírito Santo, Vitória, ES. Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9560-6627
Marcia Regina CubasPontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná, Curitiba, PR. Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2484-9354
Júlia Valéria de Oliveira Vargas BitencourtUniversidade Federal da Fronteira Sul, Santa Catarina, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3806-2288
Cândida Caniçali PrimoUniversidade Federal do Espírito Santo, Vitória, ES. Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5141-2898

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo develop a registration standard with diagnoses, outcomes and nursing interventions for an Emergency Care Unit.

methodThis is applied research of technological development developed in three steps: elaboration of diagnoses/outcomes and interventions statements following the International Classification for Nursing Practice; assessment of diagnosis/outcome relevance; organization of diagnosis/outcome and interventions statements according to health needs described in TIPESC.

resultsA total of 185 diagnoses were prepared, of which 124 (67%) were constant in the classification, and 61 had no correspondence. Of the 185 diagnoses, 143 (77%) were rated as relevant by 32 experienced emergency room nurses, and 495 nursing interventions were correlated to diagnoses/outcomes.

conclusionIt was possible to build a record standard for the Emergency Care Unit following standardized terminology, containing diagnostic statements/outcomes and relevant interventions for nursing practice assessed by nurses with practice in emergency.

Indexed as

Nursing DiagnosisStandardized Nursing TerminologyEmergency Service, HospitalHumansNursing RecordsVocabulary, Controlled

Identifiers

PMID37249384
PMCPMC10228509

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.