Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37249138›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurosurgery. Case lessons2023

Vasospasm secondary to responsive neurostimulator placement: a previously unreported complication. Illustrative case.

Brandon Rogowski, Aaron Miller, Brian F Saway, Jeffrey Wessell, Nathan C Rowland, Jonathan Ross Lena, William A Vandergrift

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurosurgery. Case lessons, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 45% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Brandon Rogowski1College of Medicine, Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Aaron Miller2College of Osteopathic Medicine, New York Institute of Technology, Glen Head, New York.
Brian F Saway3Department of Neurosurgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina; and.
Jeffrey Wessell3Department of Neurosurgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina; and.
Nathan C Rowland3Department of Neurosurgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina; and.
Jonathan Ross Lena3Department of Neurosurgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina; and.
William A Vandergrift3Department of Neurosurgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina; and.
Medical University of South Carolina · USDrexel University · USNew York Institute of Technology · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Responsive Neurostimulation (RNS) system is an implantable device for patients with drug-resistant epilepsy who are not candidates for resection of a seizure focus. As a relatively new therapeutic, the full spectrum of adverse effects has yet to be determined. A literature review revealed no previous reports of cerebral vasospasm following RNS implantation. OBSERVATIONS: A 35-year-old man developed severe angiographic and clinical vasospasm following bilateral mesial temporal lobe RNS implantation. He initially presented with concerns for status epilepticus 8 days after implantation. On hospital day 3, a decline in his clinical examination prompted imaging studies that revealed a left middle cerebral artery (MCA) stroke with angiographic evidence of severe vasospasm of the left internal carotid artery (ICA), MCA, anterior cerebral artery (ACA), and right ICA and ACA. Despite improvements in angiographic vasospasm after appropriate treatment, a thrombus developed in the posterior M2 branch, requiring mechanical thrombectomy. Ultimately, the patient was stabilized and discharged to a rehabilitation facility with residual cognitive and motor deficits. LESSONS: Cerebral vasospasm as a cause of ischemic stroke after uneventful RNS implantation is exceedingly rare, yet demands particular attention given the potential for severe consequences and the growing number of patients receiving RNS devices.

Indexed as

RNSseizuresstrokevasospasm

Identifiers

PMID37249138
PMCPMC10550669
OpenAlexW4378746519

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.