Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37249040›Full record

ArticleMagnetic resonance in medicine2023

Robust quantitative susceptibility mapping via approximate message passing with parameter estimation.

Shuai Huang, James J Lah, Jason W Allen, Deqiang Qiu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. R-Mixup: Riemannian Mixup for Biological Networks.KDD : proceedings. International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Shuai HuangDepartment of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2587-8501
James J LahDepartment of Neurology, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Jason W AllenDepartment of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Deqiang QiuDepartment of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8375-1755

Funding

The Goizueta Alzheimer's Disease Research CenterP30AG066511 · NIA · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI Amy D Rodriguez · 2020 to 2026
$29.0M
Cerebral hemodynamic impairment in symptomatic and asymptomatic Alzheimer's DiseaseR01AG072603 · NIA · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI Deqiang Qiu · 2022 to 2026
$3.8M
Fast multiparametric MR imaging as early biomarkers of Alzheimer's DiseaseR21AG064405 · NIA · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI QIU, DEQIANG · 2019 to 2020
$429k
NIA NIH HHS P30 AG066511NIA NIH HHS R01 AG072603NIA NIH HHS R21 AG064405NIH HHS P30AG066511NIH HHS R01AG072603NIH HHS R21AG064405
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeFor quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM), the lack of ground-truth in clinical settings makes it challenging to determine suitable parameters for the dipole inversion. We propose a probabilistic Bayesian approach for QSM with built-in parameter estimation, and incorporate the nonlinear formulation of the dipole inversion to achieve a robust recovery of the susceptibility maps. THEORY: From a Bayesian perspective, the image wavelet coefficients are approximately sparse and modeled by the Laplace distribution. The measurement noise is modeled by a Gaussian-mixture distribution with two components, where the second component is used to model the noise outliers. Through probabilistic inference, the susceptibility map and distribution parameters can be jointly recovered using approximate message passing (AMP).

methodsWe compare our proposed AMP with built-in parameter estimation (AMP-PE) to the state-of-the-art L1-QSM, FANSI, and MEDI approaches on the simulated and in vivo datasets, and perform experiments to explore the optimal settings of AMP-PE. Reproducible code is available at: https://github.com/EmoryCN2L/QSM_AMP_PE.

resultsOn the simulated Sim2Snr1 dataset, AMP-PE achieved the lowest NRMSE, deviation from calcification moment and the highest SSIM, while MEDI achieved the lowest high-frequency error norm. On the in vivo datasets, AMP-PE is robust and successfully recovers the susceptibility maps using the estimated parameters, whereas L1-QSM, FANSI and MEDI typically require additional visual fine-tuning to select or double-check working parameters.

conclusionAMP-PE provides automatic and adaptive parameter estimation for QSM and avoids the subjectivity from the visual fine-tuning step, making it an excellent choice for the clinical setting.

Indexed as

BrainMagnetic Resonance ImagingAlgorithmsBayes TheoremBrain MappingImage Processing, Computer-Assistedapproximate message passingcompressive sensingoutlier modelingparameter estimationquantitative susceptibility mapping

Identifiers

PMID37249040
PMCPMC10664815

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.