ArticleTechnology and health care : official journal of the European Society for Engineering and Medicine2023
Comparison of parameter types for the calibration of noninvasive continuous cardiac output monitoring of patients undergoing lumbar spinal surgery in the prone position.
Article in Technology and health care : official journal of the European Society for Engineering and Medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Use of shunt-side esCCO monitoring for hemodynamic management during hemodialysis as a novel approach for early detection of hypotension: a report of two cases.Journal of artificial organs : the official journal of the Japanese Society for Artificial Organs · 2025Article
- Reliability and benefit of estimated continuous cardiac output measurement using shunt-side SpOTherapeutic apheresis and dialysis : official peer-reviewed journal of the International Society for Apheresis, the Japanese Society for Apheresis, the Japanese Society for Dialysis Therapy · 2025Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCardiac output (CO) decreases on reversing the patient's position to the prone position. Estimated continuous cardiac output (esCCO) systems can noninvasively and continuously monitor CO calibrated by patient information or transesophageal echocardiogram (TEE).
objectiveTo compare the accuracy, precision, and trending ability of two calibration methods of CO estimation in patients in prone position.
methodsThe CO estimates calibrated by TEE (esT) and patient information (esP) of 26 participants were included. CO was collected at four time points. The accuracy and precision of agreement were evaluated using the Bland-Altman method. A four-quadrant plot was used for trending ability analysis.
resultsThe bias between esP and TEE and between esT and TEE was 0.2594 L/min (95% limits of agreement (LoA): -1.8374 L/min to 2.3562 L/min) and 0.0337 L/min (95% LoA: -0.7381 L/min to 0.8055 L/min), respectively. A strong correlation was found between ΔesP and ΔTEE (p< 0.001, CCC = 0.700) and between ΔesT and ΔTEE (p< 0.001, CCC = 0.794). The concordance rates between ΔesP and ΔTEE and between ΔesT and ΔTEE were 91.9% and 97.1%, respectively.
conclusionDespite limited accuracy and precision, esP showed acceptable trending ability. The trending ability of esCCO calibrated by the reference TEE value was comparable with that of TEE.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.