Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37248753›Full record

Observational studyInternational journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association2023

Real-world effectiveness of nivolumab and subsequent therapy in Japanese patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (POST-NIVO study): 36-month follow-up results of a clinical chart review.

Junji Yonese, Nobuyuki Hinata, Satoru Masui, Yasutomo Nakai, Suguru Shirotake, Ario Takeuchi, Teruo Inamoto, Masahiro Nozawa, Kosuke Ueda, Toru Etsunaga and 10 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readObservational StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 19 institutions in 1 country.

Junji YoneseDepartment of Urology, Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Koto-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Nobuyuki HinataDivision of Urology, Department of Surgery Related, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan.
Satoru MasuiDivision of Reparative and Regenerative Medicine, Nephro-Urologic Surgery and Andrology, Institute of Medical Life Science, Mie University Graduate School of Medicine, Tsu, Mie, Japan.
Yasutomo NakaiDepartment of Urology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan.
Suguru ShirotakeDepartment of Uro-Oncology, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Hidaka, Saitama, Japan.
Ario TakeuchiDepartment of Urology, Kyushu University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Fukuoka, Japan.
Teruo InamotoDepartment of Urology, Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Takatsuki, Osaka, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-1351-1315
Masahiro NozawaDepartment of Urology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osakasayama, Osaka, Japan.
Kosuke UedaDepartment of Urology, Kurume University School of Medicine, Fukuoka, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-8154-6616
Toru EtsunagaDepartment of Urology, Isesaki Municipal Hospital, Isesaki, Gunma, Japan.
Takahiro OsawaDepartment of Urology, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-4444-7958
Motohide UemuraDepartment of Urology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Osaka, Japan.
Go KimuraDepartment of Urology, Nippon Medical School Hospital, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Kazuyuki NumakuraDepartment of Urology, Akita University Graduate School of Medicine, Akita, Japan.
Kazutoshi YamanaDepartment of Urology, Molecular Oncology, Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, Japan.
Hideaki MiyakeDepartment of Urology, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Shizuoka, Japan.
Satoshi FukasawaProstate Center and Division of Urology, Chiba Cancer Center, Chiba, Japan.
Naoto MorishimaOncology Medical Affairs, Ono Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Osaka, Japan.
Hiroaki ItoOncology Medical, Bristol-Myers Squibb K.K., Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Hirotsugu UemuraDepartment of Urology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osakasayama, Osaka, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-3665-9523
Kindai University · JPAkita University · JPBristol-Myers Squibb (Japan) · JPChiba Cancer Center · JPHamamatsu University School of Medicine · JPHokkaido University of Science · JPIsesaki Fukushima Hospital · JPJapanese Foundation For Cancer Research · JPKobe University · JPKurume University · JPKyushu University · JPMie University · JPNiigata University · JPNippon Medical School Hospital · JPOno Pharmaceutical (Japan) · JPOsaka International Cancer Institute · JPOsaka University of Pharmaceutical Sciences · JPSaitama International Medical Center · JPThe University of Osaka · JP

Funding

Bristol-Myers Squibb K.K.Ono Pharmaceutical
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo examine the long-term effectiveness of nivolumab monotherapy and following subsequent therapies for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) in Japanese real-world settings.

methodsThis was a multicenter, retrospective, observational study, with a 36-month follow-up, and conducted in Japanese patients with mRCC who initiated nivolumab monotherapy between 1 Feb 2017 and 31 Oct 2017. Endpoints included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and objective response rate (ORR).

resultsOf the 208 patients, 36.5% received nivolumab monotherapy as second-line, 30.8% as third-line, and 31.7% as fourth- or later-line therapy. By 36 months, 12.0% of patients continued nivolumab monotherapy; 88.0% discontinued, mainly because of disease progression (66.7%). The median (m) OS was not reached irrespective of treatment line, with a 36-month OS rate of 54.3% (second-line, 57.4%; third-line, 52.6%; fourth- or later-line, 52.9%). The ORR was 24.2% and five patients achieved complete response. The OS from first-line therapy was 8.9 years. In the 95 patients receiving therapy after nivolumab, 87.4% received vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors, with mOS and mPFS of 27.4 and 8.1 months, respectively. Irrespective of treatment line, the mOS was not reached in patients with International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium (IMDC) favorable or intermediate risk at mRCC diagnosis.

conclusionsThis 36-month real-world follow-up analysis showed a survival benefit of nivolumab monotherapy for patients with mRCC. The long-term effectiveness of sequential therapy from first-line therapy to therapy after nivolumab was also demonstrated. Additionally, nivolumab monotherapy was beneficial for patients with favorable IMDC risk at the time of mRCC diagnosis.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalCarcinoma, Renal CellKidney NeoplasmsEast Asian PeopleFollow-Up StudiesHumansNivolumabRetrospective StudiesVascular Endothelial Growth Factor AAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalNivolumabVascular Endothelial Growth Factor Aimmunotherapynivolumabobservational studyrenal cell carcinomasurvival analysis

Identifiers

PMID37248753
PMCPMC11524129
OpenAlexW4378746759

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.