Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37248730›Full record

ArticleCancer medicine2023

Benign-malignant classification of pulmonary nodules by low-dose spiral computerized tomography and clinical data with machine learning in opportunistic screening.

Yansong Zheng, Jing Dong, Xue Yang, Ping Shuai, Yongli Li, Hailin Li, Shengyong Dong, Yan Gong, Miao Liu, Qiang Zeng

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Yansong ZhengDepartment of Health Medicine, Second Medical Center & National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Diseases, Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0002-3491-7672
Jing DongResearch of Medical Big Data Center & National Engineering Laboratory for Medical Big Data Application Technology, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0001-6294-9535
Xue YangDepartment of Health Medicine, Second Medical Center & National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Diseases, Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0002-6418-8781
Ping ShuaiHealth Management Center, Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.ORCID 0000-0002-3097-3052
Yongli LiDepartment of Health Management/ Henan Provincial People's Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Henan Key Laboratory of Chronic Disease Management, Zhengzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0002-3175-0272
Hailin LiBeijing Advanced Innovation Center for Big Data-Based Precision Medicine, School of Medicine and Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0002-5236-4178
Shengyong DongDepartment of Health Medicine, Second Medical Center & National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Diseases, Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0002-8395-4269
Yan GongDepartment of Health Medicine, Second Medical Center & National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Diseases, Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0002-2945-3228
Miao LiuGraduate School, Chinese PLA general hospital, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0002-7975-6702
Qiang ZengDepartment of Health Medicine, Second Medical Center & National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Diseases, Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0002-4961-0171
Chinese PLA General Hospital · CNShandong Institute of Automation · CNUniversity of Electronic Science and Technology of China · CNZhengzhou University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMany people were found with pulmonary nodules during physical examinations. It is of great practical significance to discriminate benign and malignant nodules by using data mining technology.

methodsThe subjects' demographic data, baseline examination results, and annual follow-up low-dose spiral computerized tomography (LDCT) results were recorded. The findings from annual physical examinations of positive nodules, including highly suspicious nodules and clinically tentative benign nodules, was analyzed. The extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) model was constructed and the Grid Search CV method was used to select the super parameters. External unit data were used as an external validation set to evaluate the generalization performance of the model.

resultsA total of 135,503 physical examinees were enrolled. Baseline testing found that 27,636 (20.40%) participants had clinically tentative benign nodules and 611 (0.45%) participants had highly suspicious nodules. The proportion of highly suspicious nodules in participants with negative baseline was about 0.12%-0.46%, which was lower than the baseline level except the follow-up of >5 years. In the 27,636 participants with clinically tentative benign nodules, only in the first year of LDCT re-examination was the proportion of highly suspicious nodules (1.40%) significantly greater than that of baseline screening (0.45%) (p < 0.001), and the proportion of highly suspicious nodules was not different between the baseline screening and other follow-up years (p > 0.05). Furthermore, 322 cases with benign nodules and 196 patients with malignant nodules confirmed by surgery and pathology were compared. A model and the top 15 most important clinical variables were determined by XGBoost algorithm. The area under the curve (AUC) of the model was 0.76 [95% CI: 0.67-0.84], and the accuracy was 0.75. The sensitivity and specificity of the model under this threshold were 0.78 and 0.73, respectively. In the validation of model using external data, the AUC was 0.87 and the accuracy was 0.80. The sensitivity and specificity were 0.83 and 0.77, respectively.

conclusionsIt is important that pulmonary nodules could be more accurately identified at the first LDCT examination. A model with 15 variables which are routinely measured in the clinic could be helpful to distinguish benign and malignant nodules. It could help the radiological team issue a more accurate report; and it may guide the clinical team regarding LDCT follow-up.

Indexed as

Lung NeoplasmsMultiple Pulmonary NodulesEarly Detection of CancerHumansMachine LearningSensitivity and SpecificityTomography, Spiral Computedcancer screeninghealth examinationlow-dose computed tomographylung canceropportunistic screeningpulmonary nodules

Identifiers

PMID37248730
PMCPMC10278478
OpenAlexW4378713908

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.