ArticleJournal of chest surgery2023
Incidence of and Risk Factors for the Development of Significant Tricuspid Regurgitation after Isolated Aortic Valve Replacement.
Article in Journal of chest surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Natural history and clinical outcomes of de novo functional tricuspid regurgitation after the Ross procedure.JTCVS open · 2026Article
- Risk factors for long-term severe tricuspid regurgitation following mitral valve replacement: a retrospective study.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2025Article
- Commentary: Progression of Tricuspid Regurgitation Following Aortic Valve Replacement: Risk Factors, Considerations, and Debates on Prophylactic Repair.Journal of chest surgery · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The late progression of tricuspid regurgitation (TR) after mitral valve surgery is well known. However, few reports have described the progression of TR after aortic valve surgery. We investigated the incidence of and risk factors for the development of significant TR after isolated aortic valve replacement (AVR). Methods: This study analyzed patients with less than moderate TR who underwent isolated AVR at Seoul National University Hospital from January 1990 to December 2018. Significant TR was defined as moderate or higher. Echocardiographic follow-up was performed in all patients. The Fine-Gray model was used to identify clinical risk factors for the development of significant TR. Results: In total, 583 patients (61.7±14.2 years old) were included. Operative mortality occurred in 9 patients (1.5%), and the overall survival rates at 10, 20, and 25 years were 91.1%, 83.2%, and 78.9%, respectively. Sixteen patients (2.7%) developed significant TR during the follow-up period (13 moderate; 3 severe). The cumulative incidence of significant TR at 10, 20, and 25 years was 0.77%, 3.83%, and 6.42%, respectively. No patients underwent reoperation or reintervention of the tricuspid valve. Hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis for chronic kidney disease (hazard ratio [HR], 5.188; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.154-23.322) and preoperative mild TR (HR, 5.919; 95% CI, 2.059-17.017) were associated with the development of significant TR in the multivariable analysis. Conclusion: TR progression after isolated AVR in patients with less than moderate TR is rare. Preoperative mild TR and hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis for chronic kidney disease were significant risk factors for the development of TR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.