ArticleJournal of chest surgery2023
Conversion to Veno-arteriovenous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Differential Hypoxia.
Article in Journal of chest surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Arterial cannulation site and ventilation strategy modulate cerebral injury in a rat cardiopulmonary bypass model of Harlequin syndrome.Intensive care medicine experimental · 2026Article
- Computational analysis of haemodynamics and oxygen distribution in the patient-specific aorta during VA-ECMO under various clinical scenarios.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2026Article
- Beyond Standard Parameters: Precision Hemodynamic Monitoring in Patients on Veno-Arterial ECMO.Journal of personalized medicine · 2025Review
- Harlequin Syndrome in Venoarterial ECMO and ECPELLA: When ECMO and Native or Impella Circulations Collide - A Comprehensive Review.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Review
- Managing Refractory Hypoxemia in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Obese Patients with Veno-Venous Extra-Corporeal Membrane Oxygenation: A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Patients who require initial venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA ECMO) support may need to undergo veno-arteriovenous ECMO (VAV ECMO) conversion. However, there are no definitive criteria for conversion to VAV ECMO. We report 9 cases of VAV ECMO at Gyeongsang National University Changwon Hospital, Gyeongsang National University College of Medicine. Methods: Of 158 patients who received ECMO support between January 2017 and June 2019, 82 were supported by initial VA ECMO. We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 9 patients (7 men and 2 women; age, 53.1±19.4 years) who had differential hypoxia and required VAV ECMO support. Percutaneous transaortic catheter venting was used to detect the differential hypoxia. Results: Among the 82 patients who received VA ECMO support, 9 (10.9%) had differential hypoxia and required conversion to VAV ECMO support. The mean time from VA ECMO support to VAV ECMO support and the mean duration of the VAV support were 2.1±2.2 days and 1.9±1.5 days, respectively. The average peak inspiratory pressure before and after VAV ECMO application was 23.89±3.95 cmH Conclusion: Rapid detection of differential hypoxia is required when VA ECMO is applied, and efficient conversion to VAV ECMO may be critical for patient survival.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.