Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37248650›Full record

ArticleESC heart failure2023

Development of a tool to predict the risk of incident heart failure in a general population: the HUNT for HF risk score.

Anne Pernille Ofstad, Cathrine Brunborg, Odd Erik Johansen, Bjørn Mørkedal, Morten W Fagerland, Lars Erik Laugsand, Lars L Gullestad, Håvard Dalen

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in ESC heart failure, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04648852 (Heart Failure Burden and Heart Failure Risk in the General Population in Norway), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04648852 completednot on this map

Heart Failure Burden and Heart Failure Risk in the General Population in Norway: "The HUNT for Heart Failure" Risk Score

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorHelse Nord-Trøndelag HFRan2017 to 2023Enrolled36,511ConditionsHeart FailureArmsHeart failure risk estimation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Anne Pernille OfstadDepartment of Medical Research, Baerum Hospital, Vestre Viken Hospital Trust, 3004, Drammen, Postboks 800, Norway.ORCID 0000-0003-2714-0102
Cathrine BrunborgOslo Centre for Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Research Support Services, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Odd Erik JohansenDepartment of Medical Research, Baerum Hospital, Vestre Viken Hospital Trust, 3004, Drammen, Postboks 800, Norway.
Bjørn MørkedalDepartment of Cardiology, Vestfold Hospital Trust, Tønsberg, Norway.
Morten W FagerlandOslo Centre for Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Research Support Services, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Lars Erik LaugsandDepartment of Emergency Medicine, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim, Norway.
Lars L GullestadDepartment of Cardiology, Oslo University Hospital Rikshospitalet and University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Håvard DalenDepartment of Circulation and Imaging, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Oslo University Hospital · NONorwegian University of Science and Technology · NOVestre Viken Hospital Trust · NOSykehuset i Vestfold · NO

Funding

Boehringer Ingelheim Norway KS
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsCurrently, no incident heart failure (HF) risk score that is in regular use in a general population is available. We aimed to develop this and compare with existing HF risk scores. METHODS AND

resultsParticipants in the third wave (2006-08) of the population-based Trøndelag Health Study 3 (HUNT3) were included if they reported no previous HF. Any hospital diagnoses captured during follow-up (until the end of 2018) of HF, cardiomyopathy, or hypertensive heart disease were assessed by an experienced cardiologist. Valid HF events were defined as symptoms/signs of HF and objective evidence of structural/functional abnormality of the heart at rest. The model was compared with slightly modified HF risk scores (the Health Aging and Body Composition HF risk score, the Framingham HF risk score, the Pooled Cohort equations to Prevent HF risk score, and NORRISK 2). Among 36 511 participants (mean ± SD age of 57.9 ± 13.3 years, 55.4% female), with a mean follow-up of 10.2 ± 1.3 years, 1366 developed HF (incidence rate of 3.66 per 1000 participant years). Out of the 38 relevant clinical variables assessed, we identified 12 (atrial fibrillation being the strongest) that independently predicted an HF event. The final model demonstrated good discrimination (C statistics = 0.904) and calibration, was stable in internal validation, and performed well compared with existing risk scores. The model identified that, at enrolment, 31 391 (86%), 2386 (7%), 1246 (3%), and 1488 (4%) had low, low-intermediate, high-intermediate, and high 10-year HF risk, respectively.

conclusionsTwelve clinical variables independently predicted 10-year HF risk. The model may serve well as the foundation of a practical, online risk score for HF in general practice.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04648852.

Indexed as

Heart FailureAgedFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedNorwayPopulation SurveillanceRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsEpidemiologyGeneral populationHeart failureRisk score

Identifiers

PMID37248650
PMCPMC10567672
OpenAlexW4378745535

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.