ArticleSichuan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Sichuan University. Medical science edition2023
[Epidemiological Analysis of Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae Strains in the Clinical Specimens of a Hospital].
Article in Sichuan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Sichuan University. Medical science edition, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Analysis of Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacterales Resistance in a Hospital in Kunming Over the Past Two Years.Infection and drug resistance · 2025Article
- Therapeutic Potential of a Novel Lytic Phage, vB_EclM_ECLFM1, against Carbapenem-ResistantInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To analyze the detection rate, Methods: Clinical specimens were examined according to the operating procedures of bacteriological tests. Species identification and Results: In 2021, 2215 CRE strains were isolated from 157196 clinical samples collected in this hospital, presenting a detection rate of 1.4% (2215/157196). A total of 1134 non-repetitive strains of CRE were isolated from 903 patients. The main sources of samples were respiratory tract (494/1134, 43.6%), secretion (191/1134, 16.8%) and blood (173/1134, 15.3%) samples. The cases with the same CRE strain isolated from the samples of two, three and four sites accounted for 12.5%, 4.9%, and 1.1%, respectively. The most common species was Conclusion: CRE strains are frequently isolated from samples collected from the respiratory tract, secretion, and blood. The most common strain is serine carbapenemase-producing
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.