Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37248490›Full record

ArticleRadiation oncology (London, England)2023

Deep learning for segmentation of the cervical cancer gross tumor volume on magnetic resonance imaging for brachytherapy.

Roque Rodríguez Outeiral, Patrick J González, Eva E Schaake, Uulke A van der Heide, Rita Simões

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Radiation oncology (London, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Systematic review of artificial intelligence in brachytherapy.Journal of contemporary brachytherapy · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Physical and engineering sciences in medicine · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. A review of artificial intelligence in brachytherapy.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Cervical cancer segmentation based on medical images: a literature review.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2024
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Roque Rodríguez OuteiralDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066, Amsterdam, CX, The Netherlands.
Patrick J GonzálezDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066, Amsterdam, CX, The Netherlands.
Eva E SchaakeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066, Amsterdam, CX, The Netherlands.
Uulke A van der HeideDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066, Amsterdam, CX, The Netherlands.
Rita SimõesDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066, Amsterdam, CX, The Netherlands. r.simoes@nki.nl.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSegmentation of the Gross Tumor Volume (GTV) is a crucial step in the brachytherapy (BT) treatment planning workflow. Currently, radiation oncologists segment the GTV manually, which is time-consuming. The time pressure is particularly critical for BT because during the segmentation process the patient waits immobilized in bed with the applicator in place. Automatic segmentation algorithms can potentially reduce both the clinical workload and the patient burden. Although deep learning based automatic segmentation algorithms have been extensively developed for organs at risk, automatic segmentation of the targets is less common. The aim of this study was to automatically segment the cervical cancer GTV on BT MRI images using a state-of-the-art automatic segmentation framework and assess its performance.

methodsA cohort of 195 cervical cancer patients treated between August 2012 and December 2021 was retrospectively collected. A total of 524 separate BT fractions were included and the axial T2-weighted (T2w) MRI sequence was used for this project. The 3D nnU-Net was used as the automatic segmentation framework. The automatic segmentations were compared with the manual segmentations used for clinical practice with Sørensen-Dice coefficient (Dice), 95th Hausdorff distance (95th HD) and mean surface distance (MSD). The dosimetric impact was defined as the difference in D98 (ΔD98) and D90 (ΔD90) between the manual segmentations and the automatic segmentations, evaluated using the clinical dose distribution. The performance of the network was also compared separately depending on FIGO stage and on GTV volume.

resultsThe network achieved a median Dice of 0.73 (interquartile range (IQR) = 0.50-0.80), median 95th HD of 6.8 mm (IQR = 4.2-12.5 mm) and median MSD of 1.4 mm (IQR = 0.90-2.8 mm). The median ΔD90 and ΔD98 were 0.18 Gy (IQR = -1.38-1.19 Gy) and 0.20 Gy (IQR =-1.10-0.95 Gy) respectively. No significant differences in geometric or dosimetric performance were observed between tumors with different FIGO stages, however significantly improved Dice and dosimetric performance was found for larger tumors.

conclusionsThe nnU-Net framework achieved state-of-the-art performance in the segmentation of the cervical cancer GTV on BT MRI images. Reasonable median performance was achieved geometrically and dosimetrically but with high variability among patients.

Indexed as

BrachytherapyDeep LearningUterine Cervical NeoplasmsFemaleHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingRetrospective StudiesTumor BurdenAutomatic segmentationBrachytherapyCervical cancerGTVNnu-net

Identifiers

PMID37248490
PMCPMC10227985

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.