Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37248478›Full record

ArticleHealth and quality of life outcomes2023

Agitation and aggression in people living with dementia and mild cognitive impairment in shared-housing arrangements - validation of a German version of the Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory-Short Form (CMAI-SF).

André Kratzer, Jennifer Scheel-Barteit, Janissa Altona, Karin Wolf-Ostermann, Elmar Graessel, Carolin Donath

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health and quality of life outcomes, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

André KratzerCenter for Health Services Research in Medicine, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Uniklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Schwabachanlage 6, D-91054, Erlangen, Germany. andre.kratzer@uk-erlangen.de.
Jennifer Scheel-BarteitInstitute of General Practice, Uniklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Universitätsstr. 29, D-91054, Erlangen, Germany.
Janissa AltonaInstitute for Public Health and Nursing Science (IPP), University of Bremen, Grazer Str. 4, D-28359, Bremen, Germany.
Karin Wolf-OstermannInstitute for Public Health and Nursing Science (IPP), University of Bremen, Grazer Str. 4, D-28359, Bremen, Germany.
Elmar GraesselCenter for Health Services Research in Medicine, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Uniklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Schwabachanlage 6, D-91054, Erlangen, Germany.
Carolin DonathCenter for Health Services Research in Medicine, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Uniklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Schwabachanlage 6, D-91054, Erlangen, Germany.
Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg · DEUniversitätsklinikum Erlangen · DEUniversity of Bremen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory-Short Form (CMAI-SF) is a 14-item scale for assessing agitation and aggression, derived from the original 29-item CMAI, and completed by a proxy. Because the CMAI-SF has not yet been validated in German language, the aim of this study is to explore its construct validity.

methodsBaseline data from a cluster-randomized trial to evaluate a non-pharmacological complex intervention for people living with dementia (PlwD) and mild cognitive impairment (MCI) were analyzed. The study sample consisted of 97 shared-housing arrangements (SHAs) in Germany, comprising N = 341 residents with mild to severe dementia and MCI. Trained nursing staff collected data by proxy-rating the CMAI-SF, Neuropsychiatric Inventory-Nursing Home Version (NPI-NH), and QUALIDEM. They also conducted the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA).

resultsIn an exploratory factor analysis, three factors emerged: "aggressive behavior", "verbally agitated behavior", and "physically non-aggressive behavior". The CMAI-SF total score showed good internal consistency (α = .85), and the factors themselves showed adequate internal consistency (α = .75/.76/.73). The CMAI-SF showed convergent validity with the NPI-NH agitation item (r = .66) and the NPI-NH "agitation & restless behavior" factor (r = .82). Discriminant validity was confirmed by a low (r = .28) correlation with the NPI-NH apathy item. Quality of life decreased significantly with agitation, as the CMAI-SF showed a moderate negative correlation with the QUALIDEM total score (r = -.35).

conclusionsThe 14-item CMAI-SF is a time-efficient, reliable, and valid assessment instrument. Three factors emerged that were similar to those already found in nursing home samples for the original CMAI and the CMAI-SF and in day care samples for the CMAI-SF. The findings provide preliminary evidence that the CMAI-SF can be used instead of the CMAI to reduce time, costs, and burden in future trials.

trial registrationThe DemWG study from which data were used to draft this manuscript was prospectively registered on 16 July 2019 at ISRCTN registry (ISRCTN89825211).

Indexed as

Cognitive DysfunctionDementiaAggressionHousingHumansLanguagePsychomotor AgitationQuality of LifeAggressionAgitationCMAICMAI-SFCohen-Mansfield Agitation InventoryDementiaMild cognitive impairmentReliabilityShared-housing arrangementsValidity

Identifiers

PMID37248478
PMCPMC10226019
OpenAlexW4378714166

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.