Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37248464›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2023

ssDNA is not superior to dsDNA as long HDR donors for CRISPR-mediated endogenous gene tagging in human diploid RPE1 and HCT116 cells.

Akira Mabuchi, Shoji Hata, Mariya Genova, Chiharu Tei, Kei K Ito, Masayasu Hirota, Takuma Komori, Masamitsu Fukuyama, Takumi Chinen, Atsushi Toyoda and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Precise Gene Knock-In Tools with Minimized Risk of DSBs: A Trend for Gene Manipulation.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Efficient precise integration of large DNA sequences with 3'-overhang dsDNA donors using CRISPR/Cas9.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Akira Mabuchi *Department of Physiological Chemistry, Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Bunkyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Shoji Hata *Department of Physiological Chemistry, Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Bunkyo, Tokyo, Japan. s.hata@mol.f.u-tokyo.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4094-0489
Mariya GenovaZentrum Für Molekulare Biologie, Universität Heidelberg, DKFZ-ZMBH Allianz, Heidelberg, Germany.
Chiharu TeiDepartment of Physiological Chemistry, Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Bunkyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Kei K ItoDepartment of Physiological Chemistry, Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Bunkyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Masayasu HirotaDepartment of Physiological Chemistry, Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Bunkyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Takuma KomoriDepartment of Physiological Chemistry, Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Bunkyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Masamitsu FukuyamaDepartment of Physiological Chemistry, Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Bunkyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Takumi ChinenDepartment of Physiological Chemistry, Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Bunkyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Atsushi ToyodaComparative Genomics Laboratory and Advanced Genomics Center, National Institute of Genetics, Mishima, Shizuoka, Japan.
Daiju KitagawaDepartment of Physiological Chemistry, Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Bunkyo, Tokyo, Japan. dkitagawa@mol.f.u-tokyo.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2509-5977
The University of Tokyo · JPHeidelberg University · DEJapan Science and Technology Agency · JPNational Institute of Genetics · JP

Funding

Japan Science and Technology Agency JPMJPR21ECJapan Society for the Promotion of Science 18K06246Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 19H05651Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 20K15987Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 20K22701
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecent advances in CRISPR technology have enabled us to perform gene knock-in in various species and cell lines. CRISPR-mediated knock-in requires donor DNA which serves as a template for homology-directed repair (HDR). For knock-in of short sequences or base substitutions, ssDNA donors are frequently used among various other forms of HDR donors, such as linear dsDNA. However, partly due to the complexity of long ssDNA preparation, it remains unclear whether ssDNA is the optimal type of HDR donors for insertion of long transgenes such as fluorescent reporters in human cells.

resultsIn this study, we established a nuclease-based simple method for the preparation of long ssDNA with high yield and purity, and comprehensively compared the performance of ssDNA and dsDNA donors with 90 bases of homology arms for endogenous gene tagging with long transgenes in human diploid RPE1 and HCT116 cells. Quantification using flow cytometry revealed lower efficiency of endogenous fluorescent tagging with ssDNA donors than with dsDNA. By analyzing knock-in outcomes using long-read amplicon sequencing and a classification framework, a variety of mis-integration events were detected regardless of the donor type. Importantly, the ratio of precise insertion was lower with ssDNA donors than with dsDNA. Moreover, in off-target integration analyses using donors without homology arms, ssDNA and dsDNA were comparably prone to non-homologous integration.

conclusionsThese results indicate that ssDNA is not superior to dsDNA as long HDR donors with relatively short homology arms for gene knock-in in human RPE1 and HCT116 cells.

Indexed as

Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic RepeatsCRISPR-Cas SystemsDiploidyDNADNA, Single-StrandedGene EditingGene Knock-In TechniquesHCT116 CellsHumansDNADNA, Single-StrandedCRISPR-CasKnock-inLong ssDNARepair template

Identifiers

PMID37248464
PMCPMC10226222
OpenAlexW4378715049

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.