Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37248413›Full record

ArticleNature chemical biology2023

Spontaneously established syntrophic yeast communities improve bioproduction.

Simran Kaur Aulakh, Lara Sellés Vidal, Eric J South, Huadong Peng, Sreejith Jayasree Varma, Lucia Herrera-Dominguez, Markus Ralser, Rodrigo Ledesma-Amaro

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature chemical biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
7.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Engineering an asymmetric cross-feeding consortium inSynthetic and systems biotechnology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Pathogen-Mediated Cell Fusion and Actin Cytoskeleton.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Developing Quorum Sensing-Based Collaborative Dynamic Control System in Halomonas TD01.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Simran Kaur Aulakh *Molecular Biology of Metabolism Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, London, UK.
Lara Sellés Vidal *Department of Bioengineering and Imperial College Centre for Synthetic Biology, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2537-6824
Eric J South *Department of Bioengineering and Imperial College Centre for Synthetic Biology, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4426-3729
Huadong PengDepartment of Bioengineering and Imperial College Centre for Synthetic Biology, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0635-0493
Sreejith Jayasree VarmaDepartment of Biochemistry, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1669-2254
Lucia Herrera-DominguezMolecular Biology of Metabolism Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, London, UK.
Markus RalserMolecular Biology of Metabolism Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, London, UK. markus.ralser@charite.de.ORCID 0000-0001-9535-7413
Rodrigo Ledesma-AmaroDepartment of Bioengineering and Imperial College Centre for Synthetic Biology, Imperial College London, London, UK. r.ledesma-amaro@imperial.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-2631-5898
Imperial College London · GBCentre for Human Genetics · GBHumboldt-Universität zu Berlin · DEThe Francis Crick Institute · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/R01602X/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/T011408/1—19-ERACOBIOTECH-33 SYCOLIMBiotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/T013176/1Cancer Research UK FC001134Medical Research Council FC001134Wellcome Trust 200829/Z/16/ZWellcome Trust FC001134
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nutritional codependence (syntrophy) has underexplored potential to improve biotechnological processes by using cooperating cell types. So far, design of yeast syntrophic communities has required extensive genetic manipulation, as the co-inoculation of most eukaryotic microbial auxotrophs does not result in cooperative growth. Here we employ high-throughput phenotypic screening to systematically test pairwise combinations of auxotrophic Saccharomyces cerevisiae deletion mutants. Although most coculture pairs do not enter syntrophic growth, we identify 49 pairs that spontaneously form syntrophic, synergistic communities. We characterized the stability and growth dynamics of nine cocultures and demonstrated that a pair of tryptophan auxotrophs grow by exchanging a pathway intermediate rather than end products. We then introduced a malonic semialdehyde biosynthesis pathway split between different pairs of auxotrophs, which resulted in increased production. Our results report the spontaneous formation of stable syntrophy in S. cerevisiae auxotrophs and illustrate the biotechnological potential of dividing labor in a cooperating intraspecies community.

Indexed as

BiotechnologySaccharomyces cerevisiae

Identifiers

PMID37248413
PMCPMC10374442
OpenAlexW4378716282

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.