Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37248403›Full record

ArticleLa Radiologia medica2023

Large language models for structured reporting in radiology: performance of GPT-4, ChatGPT-3.5, Perplexity and Bing.

Carlo A Mallio, Andrea C Sertorio, Caterina Bernetti, Bruno Beomonte Zobel

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in La Radiologia medica, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Carlo A MallioResearch Unit of Radiology, Department of Medicine and Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Via Álvaro del Portillo, 200, 00128, Rome, RM, Italy. c.mallio@policlinicocampus.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0149-0801
Andrea C SertorioResearch Unit of Radiology, Department of Medicine and Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Via Álvaro del Portillo, 200, 00128, Rome, RM, Italy.
Caterina BernettiResearch Unit of Radiology, Department of Medicine and Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Via Álvaro del Portillo, 200, 00128, Rome, RM, Italy.
Bruno Beomonte ZobelResearch Unit of Radiology, Department of Medicine and Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Via Álvaro del Portillo, 200, 00128, Rome, RM, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Structured reporting may improve the radiological workflow and communication among physicians. Artificial intelligence applications in medicine are growing fast. Large language models (LLMs) are recently gaining importance as valuable tools in radiology and are currently being tested for the critical task of structured reporting. We compared four LLMs models in terms of knowledge on structured reporting and templates proposal. LLMs hold a great potential for generating structured reports in radiology but additional formal validations are needed on this topic.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceRadiologyCommunicationHumansLanguageRadiographyArtificial intelligence (AI)Computed tomography (CT)Generative pre-trained transformer (GPT)-based modelsGPT-4Large language models (LLMs)Structured report

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.