Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37248386›Full record

ReviewNature methods2023

Machine learning in rare disease.

Jineta Banerjee, Jaclyn N Taroni, Robert J Allaway, Deepashree Venkatesh Prasad, Justin Guinney, Casey Greene

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature methods, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 58 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
58citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
28.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

58 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 90 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. A novel biological function-based method for mining core genes in rare disease with limited cases.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2026
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. IL18 Works Like a Two-Side Coin in Acute Pancreatitis.International journal of general medicine · 2026
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jineta Banerjee *Sage Bionetworks, Seattle, WA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1775-3645
Jaclyn N Taroni *Childhood Cancer Data Lab, Alex's Lemonade Stand Foundation, Philadelphia, PA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4734-4508
Robert J AllawaySage Bionetworks, Seattle, WA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3573-3565
Deepashree Venkatesh PrasadChildhood Cancer Data Lab, Alex's Lemonade Stand Foundation, Philadelphia, PA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5756-4083
Justin GuinneySage Bionetworks, Seattle, WA, USA.
Casey GreeneDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA. casey.s.greene@cuanschutz.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-8713-9213
Sage Bionetworks · USAlex's Lemonade Stand Foundation · USUniversity of Colorado Denver · US

Funding

Novel computational strategies to deconvolute co-occurring conditions in Down syndromeR01HD109765 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI James Christopher Costello, Casey S Greene · 2022 to 2026
$4.1M
Network-based algorithms for target identification and drug repositioning from genetic associationsR01HG010067 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI GREENE, CASEY S · 2018 to 2022
$3.2M
NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG010067NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD109765
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

High-throughput profiling methods (such as genomics or imaging) have accelerated basic research and made deep molecular characterization of patient samples routine. These approaches provide a rich portrait of genes, molecular pathways and cell types involved in disease phenotypes. Machine learning (ML) can be a useful tool for extracting disease-relevant patterns from high-dimensional datasets. However, depending upon the complexity of the biological question, machine learning often requires many samples to identify recurrent and biologically meaningful patterns. Rare diseases are inherently limited in clinical cases, leading to few samples to study. In this Perspective, we outline the challenges and emerging solutions for using ML for small sample sets, specifically in rare diseases. Advances in ML methods for rare diseases are likely to be informative for applications beyond rare diseases for which few samples exist with high-dimensional data. We propose that the method community prioritize the development of ML techniques for rare disease research.

Indexed as

Machine LearningRare DiseasesGenomicsHumans

Identifiers

PMID37248386
PMCPMC13293574
OpenAlexW3198262548

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.