Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37248348›Full record

SynthesisJournal of assisted reproduction and genetics2023

Thrombophilic gene polymorphisms and recurrent pregnancy loss: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Yuanjia Wen, Haodong He, Kai Zhao

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Association ofBiomedicines · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Genetic Associations ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Effects of Gender Differences inInternational journal of genomics · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. "Unraveling the Clot-Miscarriage Nexus: Mechanisms, Management, and Future Directions in Thrombosis-Related Recurrent Pregnancy Loss".Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yuanjia Wen *Institute of Reproductive Health, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Haodong He *Institute of Reproductive Health, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Kai ZhaoInstitute of Reproductive Health, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China. kai_zhao@hust.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6828-7579

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeRecurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) is affecting 1-4% of women who conceive approximately, and no cause could be found in more than 50% of women suffering from RPL. Inherited thrombophilias have got increasing attention in women with unexplained RPL, so we aim to explore the relationship among these most common thrombophilic polymorphisms and RPL through a literature review and meta-analysis.

methodsObservational studies from PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Science from 1997 to 7 April 2022 were searched. For each genetic variant, a fixed or random-effect model was used according to the heterogeneity test to calculate pooled ORs and 95% CIs for both dominant and recessive genetic models. Egger's line regression test was used to assess publication bias. The quality of the included articles was assessed by the Newcastle Ottawa scale.

resultsA total of 124 articles comprising 17,278 RPL patients and 16,021 controls were included. Results showed that hyperhomocysteinemia (MTHFR) C677T (dominant model: OR, 1.43; 95% CI, 1.25-1.64; recessive model: OR, 1.60; 95% CI, 1.36-1.87), MTHFR A1298C (dominant model: OR, 1.66; 95% CI, 1.26-2.18; recessive model: OR, 1.79; 95% CI, 1.42-2.26), PAI-1 4G/5G (dominant model: OR, 1.67; 95% CI, 1.36-2.06; recessive model: OR, 1.80; 95% CI, 1.39-2.32), angiotensin-converting enzyme I/D (OR, 1.23; 95% CI, 1.00-1.53), Factor XIII V34L (OR, 1.38; 95% CI, 1.02-1.87), and β-fibrinogen-455G/A (OR, 1.60; 95% CI, 1.02-2.51) were significantly associated with RPL.

conclusionThis study provides potentially useful clinical markers to evaluate the risk of RPL or to help unexplained RPL patients identify possible causes, which may allow for targeted treatment.

Indexed as

Abortion, HabitualThrombophiliaFemaleGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansMethylenetetrahydrofolate Reductase (NADPH2)Observational Studies as TopicPlasminogen Activator Inhibitor 1Polymorphism, GeneticPregnancyMethylenetetrahydrofolate Reductase (NADPH2)Plasminogen Activator Inhibitor 1Clinical markerMeta-analysisRecurrent pregnancy lossThrombophilic gene polymorphisms

Identifiers

PMID37248348
PMCPMC10352225

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.