Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37248258›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Gaidai-Xing reliability method validation for 10-MW floating wind turbines.

Oleg Gaidai, Yihan Xing, Jingxiang Xu, Rajiv Balakrishna

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Dementia death rates prediction.BMC psychiatry · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Oleg GaidaiShanghai Ocean University, Shanghai, China.
Yihan XingDepartment of Mechanical and Structural Engineering and Materials Science, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway. yihan.xing@uis.no.
Jingxiang XuShanghai Ocean University, Shanghai, China.
Rajiv BalakrishnaDepartment of Mechanical and Structural Engineering and Materials Science, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In contrast to well-known bivariate statistical approach, which is known to properly forecast extreme response levels for two-dimensional systems, the research validates innovative structural reliability method, which is particularly appropriate for multi-dimensional structural responses. The disadvantage of dealing with large system dimensionality and cross-correlation across multiple dimensions is not a benefit of traditional dependability approaches that deal with time series. Since offshore constructions are built to handle extremely high wind and wave loads, understanding these severe stresses is essential, e.g. wind turbines should be built and operated with the least amount of inconvenience. In the first scenario, the blade root flapwise bending moment is examined, whereas in the second, the tower bottom fore-aft bending moment is examined. The FAST simulation program was utilized to generate the empirical bending moments for this investigation with the load instances activated at under-rated, rated, and above-rated speeds. The novel reliability approach, in contrast to conventional reliability methods, does not call for the study of a multi-dimensional reliability function in the case of numerical simulation. As demonstrated in this work, it is now possible to assess multi-degree-of-freedom nonlinear system failure probability, in the case when only limited system measurements are available.

Identifiers

PMID37248258
PMCPMC10226987

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.