Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37247511›Full record

ArticleVision research2023

The spatial contrast sensitivity function and its neurophysiological bases.

Vance Zemon, Pamela D Butler, Michael E Legatt, James Gordon

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vision research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Vance ZemonFerkauf Graduate School of Psychology, Yeshiva University, 1165 Morris Park Ave., Bronx, NY 10461, USA; Nathan S. Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research, 140 Old Orangeburg Rd., Orangeburg, NY 10962, USA. Electronic address: vepman@aol.com.
Pamela D ButlerNathan S. Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research, 140 Old Orangeburg Rd., Orangeburg, NY 10962, USA; Department of Psychiatry, New York University School of Medicine, One Park Ave, New York, NY 10016, USA. Electronic address: pam.butler@nki.rfmh.org.
Michael E LegattResilient Grid, 7000 Mopac Expy, Suite #200, Austin, TX 78731. Electronic address: legatt@resilientgrid.com.
James GordonDepartment of Psychology, Hunter College, City University of New York, 695 Park Ave., New York, NY 10065, USA. Electronic address: jgordon@hunter.cuny.edu.
Hunter College · USNathan Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research · USNew York University · US

Funding

Visual Remediation in SchizophreniaR33MH115119 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI KAHN, PAMELA BUTLER, SILVERSTEIN, STEVEN M · 2021 to 2023
$2.1M
Visual Remediation in SchizophreniaR61MH115119 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI KAHN, PAMELA BUTLER, SILVERSTEIN, STEVEN M · 2018 to 2019
$1.5M
NIMH NIH HHS R33 MH115119NIMH NIH HHS R61 MH115119
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Contrast processing is a fundamental function of the visual system, and contrast sensitivity as a function of spatial frequency (CSF) provides critical information about the integrity of the system. Here, we used a novel iPad-based instrument to collect CSFs and fitted the data with a difference of Gaussians model to investigate the neurophysiological bases of the spatial CSF. The reliability of repeat testing within and across sessions was evaluated in a sample of 22 adults for five spatial frequencies (0.41-13 cycles/degree) and two temporal durations (33 and 500 ms). Results demonstrate that the shape of the CSF, lowpass versus bandpass, depends on the temporal stimulus condition. Comparisons with previous psychophysical studies and with single-cell data from macaques and humans indicate that the major portion of the CSF, spatial frequencies >1.5 cycles/degree regardless of temporal condition, is determined by a 'sustained' mechanism (presumably parvocellular input to primary visual cortex [V1]). Contrast sensitivity to the lowest spatial frequency tested appears to be generated by a 'transient' mechanism (presumably magnocellular input to V1). The model fits support the hypothesis that the high spatial frequency limb of the CSF reflects the receptive field profile of the center mechanism of the smallest cells in the parvocellular pathway. These findings enhance the value of contrast sensitivity testing in general and increase the accessibility of this technique for use by clinicians through implementation on a commercially-available device.

Indexed as

Contrast SensitivityVisual PathwaysAdultHumansReproducibility of ResultsContrast sensitivity functiondifference of Gaussians modelMagnocellular/parvocellular pathwaysSpatial frequencyTransient/sustained mechanismsVisual receptive field

Identifiers

PMID37247511
PMCPMC10527080
OpenAlexW4378438639

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.