Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37247404›Full record

ArticleAge and ageing2023

Deprescribing to optimise health outcomes for frail older people: a double-blind placebo-controlled randomised controlled trial-outcomes of the Opti-med study.

Christopher Etherton-Beer, Amy Page, Vasi Naganathan, Kathleen Potter, Tracy Comans, Sarah N Hilmer, Andrew J McLachlan, Richard I Lindley, Dee Mangin

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Age and ageing, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Interventions for preventing falls in older people in care facilities.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Pharmacist-led deprescribing interventions for cancer patients in a specialist palliative care setting.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Christopher Etherton-BeerWA Centre for Health and Ageing, University of Western Australia, M577, 35 Stirling Hwy, Crawley WA 6009, Australia.
Amy PageWA Centre for Health and Ageing, University of Western Australia, M577, 35 Stirling Hwy, Crawley WA 6009, Australia.
Vasi NaganathanFaculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Kathleen PotterOperations, Ryman Healthcare, Christchurch, Canterbury, New Zealand.
Tracy ComansCentre for Health Services Research, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Sarah N HilmerFaculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Andrew J McLachlanFaculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Richard I LindleyFaculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Dee ManginFamily Medicine, McMaster University. Hamilton, Canada.
University of Sydney · AUUniversity of Western Australia · AUMcMaster University · CAUniversity of Queensland · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundpotentially harmful polypharmacy is very common in older people living in aged care facilities. To date, there have been no double-blind randomised controlled studies of deprescribing multiple medications.

methodsthree-arm (open intervention, blinded intervention and blinded control) randomised controlled trial enrolling people aged over 65 years (n = 303, noting pre-specified recruitment target of n = 954) living in residential aged care facilities. The blinded groups had medications targeted for deprescribing encapsulated while the medicines were deprescribed (blind intervention) or continued (blind control). A third open intervention arm had unblinded deprescribing of targeted medications.

resultsparticipants were 76% female with mean age 85.0 ± 7.5 years. Deprescribing was associated with a significant reduction in the total number of medicines used per participant over 12 months in both intervention groups (blind intervention group -2.7 medicines, 95% CI -3.5, -1.9, and open intervention group -2.3 medicines; 95% CI -3.1, -1.4) compared with the control group (-0.3, 95% CI -1.0, 0.4, P = 0.053). Deprescribing regular medicines was not associated with any significant increase in the number of 'when required' medicines administered. There were no significant differences in mortality in the blind intervention group (HR 0.93, 95% CI 0.50, 1.73, P = 0.83) or the open intervention group (HR 1.47, 95% CI 0.83, 2.61, P = 0.19) compared to the control group.

conclusionsdeprescribing of two to three medicines per person was achieved with protocol-based deprescribing during this study. Pre-specified recruitment targets were not met, so the impact of deprescribing on survival and other clinical outcomes remains uncertain.

Indexed as

DeprescriptionsFrail ElderlyAgedAged, 80 and overDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHomes for the AgedHumansMaleOutcome Assessment, Health CarePolypharmacyRandomized Controlled Trials as Topicageingdeprescribingolder peopleresidential aged care facilities

Identifiers

PMID37247404
PMCPMC10226731
OpenAlexW4378713905

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.