Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37247217›Full record

ArticleJMIR formative research2023

Cognitive Bias Modification Training Targeting Fatigue in Patients With Kidney Disease: Usability Study.

Jody Geerts, Marcel Pieterse, Goos Laverman, Femke Waanders, Nicole Oosterom, Jacqueline Slegten, Elske Salemink, Christina Bode

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR formative research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Jody GeertsCentre for eHealth & Well-being Research, Section Psychology, Health and Technology, University of Twente, Enschede, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8826-032X
Marcel PieterseCentre for eHealth & Well-being Research, Section Psychology, Health and Technology, University of Twente, Enschede, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6900-3088
Goos LavermanDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Ziekenhuisgroep Twente Hospital, Almelo, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8716-7115
Femke WaandersDepartment of Internal Medicine, Isala Hospital, Zwolle, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4417-7732
Nicole OosteromDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Ziekenhuisgroep Twente Hospital, Almelo, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8033-7724
Jacqueline SlegtenDepartment of Internal Medicine, Isala Hospital, Zwolle, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5308-2877
Elske SaleminkDepartment of Clinical Psychology, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6885-2598
Christina BodeCentre for eHealth & Well-being Research, Section Psychology, Health and Technology, University of Twente, Enschede, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1641-8028
University of Twente · NLIsala · NLeHealth Africa · USUtrecht University · NLZiekenhuis Groep Twente · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFatigue is an important symptom for many patients, including patients with kidney disease. Cognitive biases, such as attentional bias and self-identity bias, are thought to influence fatigue. Cognitive bias modification (CBM) training is a promising technique to counter fatigue.

objectiveWe aimed to evaluate a CBM training among patients with kidney disease and health care professionals (HCPs) and assess acceptability and applicability in the clinical setting using an iterative design process to evaluate expectations and experiences with the training.

methodsThis was a longitudinal, qualitative, and multiple stakeholder-perspective usability study in which we interviewed end users and HCPs during the prototyping phase and after the end of training. We conducted semistructured interviews with 29 patients and 16 HCPs. The interviews were transcribed and analyzed thematically. Next to a general evaluation of the training, the acceptability of the training was evaluated using the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability, and applicability was assessed by evaluating obstacles and solutions for implementation in the kidney care setting.

resultsGenerally, participants were positive about the training and its applicability. The biggest negatives were doubts about effectiveness and annoyance about the repetitive character of CBM. Acceptability was judged with a mixed evaluation, with a negative evaluation of perceived effectiveness; mixed results for burden, intervention coherence, and self-efficacy; and positive results for affective attitude, ethicality, and opportunity costs. Barriers for applicability were patients' varying computer skills, subjectivity of fatigue, and integration with regular treatment (eg, the role of HCPs). Possible solutions included assigning representatives among nurses, offering training on an app, and providing assistance via a help desk. The iterative design process, including repeated waves of testing user expectations and experiences, yielded complementary data.

conclusionsTo the best of our knowledge, this study is the first to introduce a CBM training targeting fatigue. Furthermore, this study provides one of the first user evaluations of a CBM training, both among patients with kidney disease and their care providers. Overall, the training was evaluated positively, although acceptability showed mixed results. Applicability was positive although barriers were identified. The proposed solutions require further testing, preferably following the same frameworks, as the iteration in this study contributed positively to the quality of the training. Therefore, future research should follow the same frameworks and consider stakeholders and end users in eHealth intervention design.

Indexed as

acceptabilityapplicabilitycognitive biasdesignfatiguenephrologypatient perspectivequalitative studyusabilityvitality

Identifiers

PMID37247217
PMCPMC10262024
OpenAlexW4316093166

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.