Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37247136›Full record

ArticleCancer causes & control : CCC2023

Building relationships to connect cancer researchers with community members: 'bench to community pipeline'.

Allison R Dahlke, Noelle K LoConte, Angela Flickinger, Sara Richie, Jenna Klink, Amy Trentham-Dietz, Rebecca Shirley, Kristin Litzelman

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer causes & control : CCC, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Allison R DahlkeUW-Madison- Carbone Cancer Center, Madison, WI, USA. ardahlke@wisc.edu.
Noelle K LoConteUW-Madison- Carbone Cancer Center, Madison, WI, USA.
Angela FlickingerUW-Madison Division of Extension, Madison, WI, USA.
Sara RichieUW-Madison Division of Extension, Madison, WI, USA.
Jenna KlinkUW-Madison Division of Extension, Madison, WI, USA.
Amy Trentham-DietzUW-Madison- Carbone Cancer Center, Madison, WI, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5971-4660
Rebecca ShirleyUW-Madison- Carbone Cancer Center, Madison, WI, USA.
Kristin LitzelmanUW-Madison- Carbone Cancer Center, Madison, WI, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5542-6434
University of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

UW COMPREHENSIVE CANCER CENTER SUPPORTP30CA014520 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Christian Capitini · 1985 to 2026
$142.6M
NCI NIH HHS P30CA014520
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePartnerships between researchers and community members and organizations can offer multiple benefits for research relevance and dissemination. The goal of this project was to build infrastructure to create bidirectional relationships between University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center (UWCCC) researchers and community educators in the Division of Extension, which connects the knowledge and resources of the university to communities across the state.

methodsThis project had three aims: (1) create linkages with Extension; (2) establish an in-reach program to educate and train researchers on the science of Community Outreach and Engagement (COE); and (3) identify and facilitate collaborative projects between scientists and communities. Survey and focus group-based needs assessments were completed with both researchers and Extension educators and program activity evaluations were conducted.

resultsMost Extension educators (71%) indicated a strong interest in partnering on COE projects. UWCCC faculty indicated interest in further disseminating their research, but also indicated barriers in connecting with communities. Outreach webinars were created and disseminated to community, a "COE in-reach toolkit" for faculty was created and a series of "speed networking" events were hosted to pair researchers and community. Evaluations indicated the acceptability and usefulness of these activities and supported continuation of collaborative efforts.

conclusionContinued relationship and skill building, along with a sustainability plan, is critical to support the translation of basic, clinical, and population research to action in the community outreach and engagement context. Further incentives for faculty should be explored for the recruitment of basic scientists into community engagement work.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsResearch PersonnelCommunity-Institutional RelationsHumansProgram EvaluationSurveys and QuestionnairesBasic scienceCancer ControlCommunity engagementExtensionOutreachResearch Dissemination

Identifiers

PMID37247136
PMCPMC10226433
OpenAlexW4378640364

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.