ArticleJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology2023
Intraoperative frozen section in gynaecology cancers with special reference to ovarian tumours: time to "unfreeze" the pitfalls in the path of the Derby horse of Oncology.
Article in Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
- Intraoperative cytologic evaluation for ovarian tumors : Utility in low resource settings and a roadmap for adoption.Gynecologic oncology reports · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeIn an oncological set up the role of frozen section biopsy is undeniable. They serve as an important tool for surgeon's intraoperative decision making but the diagnostic reliability of intraoperative frozen section may vary from institute to institute. The surgeon should be well aware of the accuracy of the frozen section reports in their setup to enable them to take decisions based on the report. This is why we had conducted a retrospective study at Dr B. Borooah Cancer Institute, Guwahati, Assam, India to find out our institutional frozen section accuracy.
methodsThe study was conducted from 1st January 2017 to 31st December 2022 (5 years). All gynaecology oncology patients who were operated on during the study period and had an intraoperative frozen section done were included in the study. Patients who had incomplete final histopathological report (HPR) or no final HPR were excluded from the study. Frozen section and final histopathology report were compared and analysed and discordant cases were analysed based on the degree of discordancy.
resultsFor benign ovarian disease, the IFS accuracy, sensitivity and specificity are 96.7%, 100% and 93%, respectively. For borderline ovarian disease the IFS accuracy, sensitivity and specificity are 96.7%, 80% and 97.6%, respectively. For malignant ovarian disease the IFS accuracy, sensitivity and specificity are 95.4%, 89.1% and 100%, respectively. Sampling error was the most common cause of discordancy.
conclusionIntraoperative frozen section may not have 100% diagnostic accuracy but still it is the running horse of our oncological institute.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.