ArticleActa neurochirurgica2023
Embolization of the middle meningeal artery vs. second surgery-treatment response and volume course of recurrent chronic subdural hematomas.
Article in Acta neurochirurgica, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Comparison of middle meningeal artery embolization alone, in combination with surgery, and surgery alone for chronic subdural hematoma: a network meta-analysis of 143,590 patients.Neurosurgical review · 2025Pooled it
- Adjunct Middle Meningeal Artery Embolization Versus Surgery for Chronic Subdural Hematoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Neurosurgical review · 2024Pooled it
- Middle Meningeal Artery Embolization for Recurrent Chronic Subdural Hematoma.Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society · 2026Article
- Middle Meningeal Artery Embolization for the Treatment of Chronic Subdural Hematomas-a German Nationwide Multi-center Study On 718 Embolizations.Clinical neuroradiology · 2026Article
- Endoscopic surgery operation followed with a comprehensive management reduces the recurrence rate and promotes neurological recovery in the treatment of chronic subdural hematoma.Neurosurgical review · 2026Article
- A propensity score matching analysis of the efficacy and safety of middle meningeal artery embolization versus burr hole drainage in the treatment of chronic subdural hematomas.Neuroradiology · 2025Article
- Standalone Middle Meningeal Artery Embolization Versus Medical Management for Chronic Subdural Hematomas: A Multi-Institutional and Multinational Database Study.World neurosurgery · 2025Article
- Rescue management of recurrent or growing non-acute subdural hematoma following standalone or adjunctive middle meningeal artery embolization: A case series and systematic review.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2025Article
- Imaging and Clinical Outcomes Six Months After Middle Meningeal Artery Embolization with Squid for Chronic Subdural Hematoma: A Prospective Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Review
- Featured minimally invasive therapeutic approach for chronic subdural hematoma: Embolization of middle meningeal artery - A narrative review.Brain circulationReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDespite multiple studies on the embolization of the middle meningeal artery, there is limited data on the treatment response of recurrent chronic subdural hematomas (CSDH) to embolization and on the volume change.
methodsWe retrospectively compared the treatment response and volume change of recurrent CSDHs in a conventional group (second surgery) with an embolization group (embolization as stand-alone treatment) during the time-period from August 2019 until June 2022. Different clinical and radiological factors were assessed. Treatment failure was defined as necessity of treatment for second recurrence. Hematoma volumes were determined in the initial CT scan before first surgery, after the first surgery, before retreatment as well as in an early (1 day-2 weeks) and in a late follow-up CT scan (2-8 weeks).
resultsFifty recurrent hematomas after initial surgery were treated either by second surgery (n = 27) or by embolization (n = 23). 8/27 (26,6%) surgically treated and 3/23 (13%) of the hematomas treated by embolization needed to be treated again. This leads to an efficacy in recurrent hematomas of 73,4% in surgically treated and of 87% in embolized hematomas (p = 0.189). In the conventional group, mean volume decreased significantly already in the first follow-up CT scan from 101.7 ml (SD 53.7) to 60.7 ml (SD 40.3) (p = 0.001) and dropped further in the later follow-up scan to 46.6 ml (SD 37.1) (p = 0.001). In the embolization group, the mean volume did decrease insignificantly from 75.1 ml (SD 27.3) to 68 ml (SD 31.4) in the first scan (p = 0.062). However, in the late scan significant volume reduction to 30.8 ml (SD 17.1) could be observed (p = 0.002).
conclusionsEmbolization of the middle meningeal artery is an effective treatment option for recurrent CSDH. Patients with mild symptoms who can tolerate slow volume reduction are suitable for embolization, whereas patients with severe symptoms should be reserved for surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.