Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37247004›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of applied physiology2023

Lumbar muscle adaptations to external perturbations are modulated by trunk posture.

Jacques Abboud, Julien Ducas, Émile Marineau-Bélanger, Alessio Gallina

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of applied physiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Methods for assessing core muscle co-activation in the lumbar region: a narrative review.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jacques AbboudDépartement des Sciences de l'Activité Physique, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières, 3351 boul. des Forges, C.P. 500, Trois-Rivières, QC, G8Z 4M3, Canada. jacques.abboud@uqtr.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9019-8000
Julien DucasDépartement des Sciences de l'Activité Physique, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières, 3351 boul. des Forges, C.P. 500, Trois-Rivières, QC, G8Z 4M3, Canada.
Émile Marineau-BélangerDépartement des Sciences de l'Activité Physique, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières, 3351 boul. des Forges, C.P. 500, Trois-Rivières, QC, G8Z 4M3, Canada.
Alessio GallinaSchool of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.

Funding

Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada RGPIN-2020-06076
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo investigate if the recruitment of different regions within the lumbar extensor muscles in response to unexpected perturbations depends on trunk posture.

methodsIn a semi-seated posture, healthy adult participants experienced unexpected posterior-anterior trunk perturbations in three different postures: neutral, trunk flexion and left trunk rotation. High-density surface electromyography was used to identify the regional distribution of activation within the lumbar erector spinae muscles. The effect of posture and side (left vs right) on muscle activity and centroid coordinates was investigated at baseline and in response to perturbations.

resultsHigher muscle activity was observed in trunk flexion compared to neutral and rotation postures at baseline (multiple p < 0.001) and in response to the perturbation (multiple p < 0.01). At baseline, the centroid of the electromyographic amplitude distribution was localized more medially in trunk flexion compared to trunk neutral posture (p = 0.003), while activation was localized more laterally in response to the perturbation (multiple p < 0.05). When the trunk was rotated, the electromyographic amplitude distribution was localized more cranially on the left than the right side, both at baseline (p = 0.001) and in response to the perturbation (p = 0.001). Finally, a more lateral location of the centroid on the left side in rotation compared to neutral posture was observed in response to the perturbation (multiple p < 0.001).

conclusionsRegional differences in the distribution of electromyographic amplitude indicate that different muscle regions were recruited in different trunk postures and in response to perturbations, possibly based on regional mechanical advantage of the erector spinae muscle fibers.

Indexed as

Muscle ContractionPostureAdultElectromyographyHumansMusclesMuscle, SkeletalParaspinal MusclesErector spinaeHigh-density EMGPostural perturbationTrunk

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.