Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37246917›Full record

ArticleQuarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)2024

Uncovering the cognitive mechanisms underlying the gaze cueing effect.

Manikya Alister, Kate T McKay, David K Sewell, Nathan J Evans

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Negative targets specifically enhance conscious and unconscious social attention.British journal of psychology (London, England : 1953) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. What can evidence accumulation modelling tell us about human social cognition?Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006) · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Manikya AlisterMelbourne School of Psychological Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8630-9938
Kate T McKaySchool of Psychology, The University of Queensland, Saint Lucia, QLD, Australia.
David K SewellSchool of Psychology, The University of Queensland, Saint Lucia, QLD, Australia.
Nathan J EvansSchool of Psychology, The University of Queensland, Saint Lucia, QLD, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The gaze cueing effect is the tendency for people to respond faster to targets appearing at locations gazed at by others, compared with locations gazed away from by others. The effect is robust, widely studied, and is an influential finding within social cognition. Formal evidence accumulation models provide the dominant theoretical account of the cognitive processes underlying speeded decision-making, but they have rarely been applied to social cognition research. In this study, using a combination of individual-level and hierarchical computational modelling techniques, we applied evidence accumulation models to gaze cueing data (three data sets total,

Indexed as

CuesFixation, OcularAttentionCognitionHumansReaction Timeattentioncomputational modellingcueingdecision-makingGazesocial cognition

Identifiers

PMID37246917
PMCPMC10960327

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.