Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37246710›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2023

On the accuracy of the epigenetic copy machine: comprehensive specificity analysis of the DNMT1 DNA methyltransferase.

Sabrina Adam, Viviane Klingel, Nicole E Radde, Pavel Bashtrykov, Albert Jeltsch

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sabrina AdamInstitute of Biochemistry and Technical Biochemistry, Department of Biochemistry, University of Stuttgart, Allmandring 31, 70569 Stuttgart, Germany.
Viviane KlingelInstitute for Systems Theory and Automatic Control, University of Stuttgart, Pfaffenwaldring 9, 70569 Stuttgart, Germany.
Nicole E RaddeInstitute for Systems Theory and Automatic Control, University of Stuttgart, Pfaffenwaldring 9, 70569 Stuttgart, Germany.
Pavel BashtrykovInstitute of Biochemistry and Technical Biochemistry, Department of Biochemistry, University of Stuttgart, Allmandring 31, 70569 Stuttgart, Germany.
Albert JeltschInstitute of Biochemistry and Technical Biochemistry, Department of Biochemistry, University of Stuttgart, Allmandring 31, 70569 Stuttgart, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6113-9290
University of Stuttgart · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The specificity of DNMT1 for hemimethylated DNA is a central feature for the inheritance of DNA methylation. We investigated this property in competitive methylation kinetics using hemimethylated (HM), hemihydroxymethylated (OH) and unmethylated (UM) substrates with single CpG sites in a randomized sequence context. DNMT1 shows a strong flanking sequence dependent HM/UM specificity of 80-fold on average, which is slightly enhanced on long hemimethylated DNA substrates. To explain this strong effect of a single methyl group, we propose a novel model in which the presence of the 5mC methyl group changes the conformation of the DNMT1-DNA complex into an active conformation by steric repulsion. The HM/OH preference is flanking sequence dependent and on average only 13-fold, indicating that passive DNA demethylation by 5hmC generation is not efficient in many flanking contexts. The CXXC domain of DNMT1 has a moderate flanking sequence dependent contribution to HM/UM specificity during DNA association to DNMT1, but not if DNMT1 methylates long DNA molecules in processive methylation mode. Comparison of genomic methylation patterns from mouse ES cell lines with various deletions of DNMTs and TETs with our data revealed that the UM specificity profile is most related to cellular methylation patterns, indicating that de novo methylation activity of DNMT1 shapes the DNA methylome in these cells.

Indexed as

DNADNA (Cytosine-5-)-MethyltransferasesAnimalsDNA (Cytosine-5-)-Methyltransferase 1DNA MethylationDNA Modification MethylasesEpigenesis, GeneticMiceDNADNA (Cytosine-5-)-Methyltransferase 1DNA (Cytosine-5-)-MethyltransferasesDNA Modification Methylases

Identifiers

PMID37246710
PMCPMC10359454
OpenAlexW4378639908

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.