Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37246381›Full record

ArticlePhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2023

Monitoring the fabric of nature: using allometric trophic network models and observations to assess policy effects on biodiversity.

Sergio A Navarrete, M Isidora Ávila-Thieme, Daniel Valencia, Alexandre Génin, Stefan Gelcich

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Economic factors underlying biodiversity loss.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Review
  2. Monitoring the fabric of nature: using allometric trophic network models and observations to assess policy effects on biodiversity.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Article
  3. Detecting and attributing the causes of biodiversity change: needs, gaps and solutions.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sergio A NavarreteEstación Costera de Investigaciones Marinas, Las Cruces, Departamento de Ecología, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago 8331150, Chile.ORCID 0000-0003-4021-3863
M Isidora Ávila-ThiemeInstituto Milenio en Socio-Ecología Costera (SECOS) and Center for Applied Ecology and Sustainability (CAPES), Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago 8331150, Chile.ORCID 0000-0003-0772-4717
Daniel ValenciaEstación Costera de Investigaciones Marinas, Las Cruces, Departamento de Ecología, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago 8331150, Chile.ORCID 0000-0003-1139-1740
Alexandre GéninEstación Costera de Investigaciones Marinas, Las Cruces, Departamento de Ecología, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago 8331150, Chile.ORCID 0000-0002-3333-1338
Stefan GelcichInstituto Milenio en Socio-Ecología Costera (SECOS) and Center for Applied Ecology and Sustainability (CAPES), Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago 8331150, Chile.ORCID 0000-0002-5976-9311

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Species diversity underpins all ecosystem services that support life. Despite this recognition and the great advances in detecting biodiversity, exactly how many and which species co-occur and interact, directly or indirectly in any ecosystem is unknown. Biodiversity accounts are incomplete; taxonomically, size, habitat, mobility or rarity biased. In the ocean, the provisioning of fish, invertebrates and algae is a fundamental ecosystem service. This extracted biomass depends on a myriad of microscopic and macroscopic organisms that make up the fabric of nature and which are affected by management actions. Monitoring them all and attributing changes to management policies is daunting. Here we propose that dynamic quantitative models of species interactions can be used to link management policy and compliance with complex ecological networks. This allows managers to qualitatively identify 'interaction-indicator' species, which are highly impacted by management policies through propagation of complex ecological interactions. We ground the approach in intertidal kelp harvesting in Chile and fishers' compliance with policies. Results allow us to identify sets of species that respond to management policy and/or compliance, but which are often not included in standardized monitoring. The proposed approach aids in the design of biodiversity programmes that attempt to connect management with biodiversity change. This article is part of the theme issue 'Detecting and attributing the causes of biodiversity change: needs, gaps and solutions'.

Indexed as

BiodiversityEcosystemAnimalsBiomassFishesInvertebratesbiodiversity monitoringecosystem-based managementillegal fishingkelp forestsnon-compliancespecies interactions

Identifiers

PMID37246381
PMCPMC10225859

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.