ReviewPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2023
Disrupting and diversifying the values, voices and governance principles that shape biodiversity science and management.
Review in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Natural history in the Anthropocene.Bioscience · 2026Article
- Eelgrass ecosystem collapse and social-ecological regime shift driven by hydropower development and climate change.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Resilient Biodiversity Conservation: Working with Social-Ecological Connections to Navigate Crises.Bioscience · 2026Review
- 'A bureaucracy within a bureaucracy': The Department of Fisheries and Oceans and relationships under the Maa-nulth Treaty.Environment and planning. C, Politics and space · 2025Article
- Ozboneviz: an Australian precedent in FAIR 3D imagery and extended biodiversity collections.Bioscience · 2025Article
- An aspirational approach to planetary futures.Nature · 2025Review
- Forecasting sea otter recolonization: insights from isotopic analysis of modern and zooarchaeological populations.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2025Article
- Creating constellations of coexistence through connections between people in human-wildlife conflict areas.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2024Article
- Boundary Spanning Methodological Approaches for Collaborative Moose Governance in Eeyou Istchee.Environmental management · 2024Article
- Rituals as Nature-Based Governance of reciprocity between people and nature.Open research Europe · 2024Article
- Detecting and attributing the causes of biodiversity change: needs, gaps and solutions.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
26 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
With climate, biodiversity and inequity crises squarely upon us, never has there been a more pressing time to rethink how we conceptualize, understand and manage our relationship with Earth's biodiversity. Here, we describe governance principles of 17 Indigenous Nations from the Northwest Coast of North America used to understand and steward relationships among all components of nature, including humans. We then chart the colonial origins of biodiversity science and use the complex case of sea otter recovery to illuminate how ancestral governance principles can be mobilized to characterize, manage and restore biodiversity in more inclusive, integrative and equitable ways. To enhance environmental sustainability, resilience and social justice amid today's crises, we need to broaden who benefits from and participates in the sciences of biodiversity by expanding the values and methodologies that shape such initiatives. In practice, biodiversity conservation and natural resource management need to shift from centralized, siloed approaches to those that can accommodate plurality in values, objectives, governance systems, legal traditions and ways of knowing. In doing so, developing solutions to our planetary crises becomes a shared responsibility. This article is part of the theme issue 'Detecting and attributing the causes of biodiversity change: needs, gaps and solutions'.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.