Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37246371›Full record

ArticleThe Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association2024

Patient Reported Outcome Following the Skoog Unilateral Cleft Lip Repair among Adults- a Long-Term Cohort Study and Comparison to a Non-cleft Population.

Roshan Peroz, Malin Hakelius, Alberto Falk-Delgado, Yun Phua, Maria Mani

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Psychosocial empowerment following orthognathic surgery for patients born with cleft lip and/or palate.International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being · 2026
    Article
  2. What We Learnt in Unilateral Cleft Lip Repair Between Millard's and Tennison-Randall's Techniques: Comparison of the Outcomes in Adult Patients.The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Roshan PerozDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University and Uppsala university hospital, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID 0009-0006-1314-6457
Malin HakeliusDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University and Uppsala university hospital, Uppsala, Sweden.
Alberto Falk-DelgadoDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Yun PhuaDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Queensland Children's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia.
Maria ManiDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University and Uppsala university hospital, Uppsala, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe study primarily aimed to compare satisfaction with lip appearance among adults treated for unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP) with Skoog's primary lip repair procedure to those without clefts. The secondary aim was to determine whether satisfaction with lip appearance and the desire to change the lip/face appearance correlated with the number of secondary lip revisions performed.

designLong-term follow-up. PATIENTS/SETTINGS: All UCLP patients treated at the Uppsala University Hospital born between 1960- and 1987 (n  =  109) were invited. At an average of 37 years following the primary lip repair, the participation rate was 76% (n  =  83). A control group of adults without cleft (n  =  67) completed the same study protocol for comparison.

main outcome measuresSatisfaction with appearance was measured with The Satisfaction with Appearance Questionnaire (SWA) and a modified version of the Body Cathexis -Scale was used to assess the desire to change the lip and facial appearance.

resultsUCLP patients were less satisfied with their lip, face, and overall appearance and reported a greater desire to change the appearance of their lips and face than non-cleft controls (p < 0.001). Dissatisfaction with lip appearance correlated to a greater willingness to change the appearance of the lip and face. No correlation was found between satisfaction with appearance and the number of the previously performed secondary lip revisions.

conclusionAdults treated for UCLP are less satisfied with the appearance of their lips compared to the non-cleft population. The number of secondary revisions does not necessarily correlate to greater satisfaction with lip appearance.

Indexed as

Cleft LipPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresPatient SatisfactionAdultCleft PalateEstheticsFemaleHumansMaleReoperationSurveys and Questionnairescleft lip and palatecraniofacial surgerylip formpatient satisfaction

Identifiers

PMID37246371
PMCPMC11323433

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.