ArticleJournal of translational medicine2023
Development and validation of explainable machine-learning models for carotid atherosclerosis early screening.
Article in Journal of translational medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development and Internal Validation of a Risk Prediction Model for Carotid Atherosclerosis in the Hyperuricemia Population.Vascular health and risk management · 2024Trial
- Development and validation of a machine learning-based predictive model for prognosis in cerebral hemorrhage patients after hyperbaric oxygen therapy.Medical gas research · 2027Article
- Multi-omics integration and machine learning identify an ACKR1Clinical and translational medicine · 2026Article
- Plaque-level machine-learning prediction of carotid plaque vulnerability on computed tomography angiography.Neuroradiology · 2026Article
- Development and validation of a risk predictive nomogram for carotid intima-media thickening in patients with type 2 diabetes.Acta diabetologica · 2026Article
- Prediction of carotid vulnerable plaques in patients with type 2 diabetes using interpretable machine learning models.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
- Functional connectivity and graph theory of impaired central visual pathways in acute ischemic stroke based on functional magnetic resonance imaging.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
- Classification of breast cancer molecular subtypes based on contrast-enhanced ultrasound and superb microvascular imaging using machine learning approach.Gland surgery · 2025Article
- Machine Learning and Deep Learning Hybrid Approach Based on Muscle Imaging Features for Diagnosis of Esophageal Cancer.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Concomitant Prediction of the Ki67 and PIT-1 Expression in Pituitary Adenoma Using Different Radiomics Models.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2025Article
- Differential diagnosis of eczema and psoriasis using routine clinical data and machine learning: development of a web-based tool in a multicenter outpatient cohort.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Interpretable multiparametric MRI radiomics-based machine learning model for preoperative differentiation between benign and malignant prostate masses: a diagnostic, multicenter study.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- SHAP Analysis of Machine Learning-Based Carotid Atherosclerosis Prediction of Older Adults with OSA, a Multicenter Study.Nature and science of sleep · 2025Article
- Interpretable machine learning models based on multi-dimensional fusion data for predicting positive surgical margins in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a retrospective study.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Comprehensive Analysis of the SUMO-related Signature: Implication for Diagnosis, Prognosis, and Immune Therapeutic Approaches in Cervical Cancer.Biochemical genetics · 2024Article
- Combining Computational Fluid Dynamics, Structural Analysis, and Machine Learning to Predict Cerebrovascular Events: A Mild ML Approach.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCarotid atherosclerosis (CAS), an important factor in the development of stroke, is a major public health concern. The aim of this study was to establish and validate machine learning (ML) models for early screening of CAS using routine health check-up indicators in northeast China.
methodsA total of 69,601 health check-up records from the health examination center of the First Hospital of China Medical University (Shenyang, China) were collected between 2018 and 2019. For the 2019 records, 80% were assigned to the training set and 20% to the testing set. The 2018 records were used as the external validation dataset. Ten ML algorithms, including decision tree (DT), K-nearest neighbors (KNN), logistic regression (LR), naive Bayes (NB), random forest (RF), multiplayer perceptron (MLP), extreme gradient boosting machine (XGB), gradient boosting decision tree (GBDT), linear support vector machine (SVM-linear), and non-linear support vector machine (SVM-nonlinear), were used to construct CAS screening models. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (auROC) and precision-recall curve (auPR) were used as measures of model performance. The SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) method was used to demonstrate the interpretability of the optimal model.
resultsA total of 6315 records of patients undergoing carotid ultrasonography were collected; of these, 1632, 407, and 1141 patients were diagnosed with CAS in the training, internal validation, and external validation datasets, respectively. The GBDT model achieved the highest performance metrics with auROC of 0.860 (95% CI 0.839-0.880) in the internal validation dataset and 0.851 (95% CI 0.837-0.863) in the external validation dataset. Individuals with diabetes or those over 65 years of age showed low negative predictive value. In the interpretability analysis, age was the most important factor influencing the performance of the GBDT model, followed by sex and non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol.
conclusionsThe ML models developed could provide good performance for CAS identification using routine health check-up indicators and could hopefully be applied in scenarios without ethnic and geographic heterogeneity for CAS prevention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.