Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37246179›Full record

ArticleIntensive care medicine experimental2023

Temporal relationship between vasopressor and sedative administration and cerebrovascular response in traumatic brain injury: a time-series analysis.

Logan Froese, Alwyn Gomez, Amanjyot Singh Sainbhi, Nuray Vakitbilir, Izabella Marquez, Fiorella Amenta, Kevin Y Stein, Frederick A Zeiler

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Intensive care medicine experimental, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Observational
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Logan FroeseBiomedical Engineering, Price Faculty of Engineering, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada. log.froese@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6076-0189
Alwyn GomezSection of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada. gomeza35@myumanitoba.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3737-2065
Amanjyot Singh SainbhiBiomedical Engineering, Price Faculty of Engineering, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3231-5683
Nuray VakitbilirBiomedical Engineering, Price Faculty of Engineering, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2764-145X
Izabella MarquezUndergraduate Engineering, Price Faculty of Engineering, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada.
Fiorella AmentaUndergraduate Engineering, Price Faculty of Engineering, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada.
Kevin Y SteinBiomedical Engineering, Price Faculty of Engineering, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5983-008X
Frederick A ZeilerBiomedical Engineering, Price Faculty of Engineering, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1737-0510
University of Manitoba · CAManitoba Health · CAUniversity of Cambridge · GB

Funding

Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada ALLRP-578524-22Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada DGECR-2022-00260Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada RGPIN-2022-03621
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough vasopressor and sedative agents are commonly used within the intensive care unit to mediate systemic and cerebral physiology, the full impact such agents have on cerebrovascular reactivity remains unclear. Using a prospectively maintained database of high-resolution critical care and physiology, the time-series relationship between vasopressor/sedative administration, and cerebrovascular reactivity was interrogated. Cerebrovascular reactivity was assessed through intracranial pressure and near infrared spectroscopy measures. Using these derived measures, the relationship between hourly dose of medication and hourly index values could be evaluated. The individual medication dose change and their corresponding physiological response was compared. Given the high number of doses of propofol and norepinephrine, a latent profile analysis was used to identify any underlying demographic or variable relationships. Finally, using time-series methodologies of Granger causality and vector impulse response functions, the relationships between the cerebrovascular reactivity derived variables were compared.

resultsFrom this retrospective observational study of 103 TBI patients, the evaluation between the changes in vasopressor or sedative agent dosing and the previously described cerebral physiologies was completed. The assessment of the physiology pre/post infusion agent change resulted in similar overall values (Wilcoxon signed-ranked p value > 0.05). Time series methodologies demonstrated that the basic physiological relationships were identical before and after an infusion agent was changed (Granger causality demonstrated the same directional impact in over 95% of the moments, with response function being graphically identical).

conclusionsThis study suggests that overall, there was a limited association between the changes in vasopressor or sedative agent dosing and the previously described cerebral physiologies including that of cerebrovascular reactivity. Thus, current regimens of administered sedative and vasopressor agents appear to have little to no impact on cerebrovascular reactivity in TBI.

Indexed as

AutoregulationCerebrovascular reactivitySedative drugsVasopressors

Identifiers

PMID37246179
PMCPMC10225391
OpenAlexW4378628140

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.