Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37246049›Full record

ArticleUltrasound in medicine & biology2023

Controlled Hyperthermia With High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound and Ultrasound Contrast Agent Microbubbles in Porcine Liver.

Eric K Juang, Lance H De Koninck, Kaleb S Vuong, Aswin Gnanaskandan, Chao-Tsung Hsiao, Michalakis A Averkiou

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ultrasound in medicine & biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Delivery of Cavitation Therapy With a Modified Clinical Scanner: In Vitro Evaluation.IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Eric K JuangDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Lance H De KoninckDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Kaleb S VuongDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Aswin GnanaskandanDepartment of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, MA, USA.
Chao-Tsung HsiaoDynaflow Inc., Jessup, MD, USA.
Michalakis A AverkiouDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA. Electronic address: maverk@uw.edu.
University of Washington · USDynaflow (United States) · USWorcester Polytechnic Institute · US

Funding

A novel paradigm of sensitization of the tumor microenvironment with image-guided ultrasound cavitation and mechanotherapeutics for targeted HCC treatmentR01EB032655 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI AVERKIOU, MICHALAKIS · 2022 to 2025
$2.4M
Development of a Numerical Model for Microbubble Enhanced Treatment in HIFU TherapyR44CA213866 · NCI · DYNAFLOW, INC. · PI HSIAO, CHAO-TSUNG · 2018 to 2019
$1.0M
NCI NIH HHS R44 CA213866NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB032655
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe objective of this work was to study microbubble-enhanced temperature elevation with high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) at different acoustic pressures and under image guidance. The microbubbles were administered with either local or vascular injections (that mimic systemic injections) in perfused and non-perfused ex vivo porcine liver under ultrasound image guidance.

methodsPorcine liver was insonified for 30 s with a single-element HIFU transducer (0.9 MHz, 0.413 ms, 82% duty cycle, focal pressures of 0.6-3.5 MPa). Contrast microbubbles were injected either locally or through the vasculature. A needle thermocouple at the focus measured temperature elevation. Diagnostic ultrasound (Philips iU22, C5-1 probe) guided placement of the thermocouple and delivery of microbubbles and monitored the procedure in real time.

resultsAt lower acoustic pressures (0.6 and 1.2 MPa) in non-perfused liver, inertial cavitation of the injected microbubbles led to greater temperatures at the focus compared with HIFU-only treatments. At higher pressures (2.4 and 3.5 MPa) native inertial cavitation in the tissue (without injecting microbubbles) resulted in temperature elevations similar to those after injecting microbubbles. The heated area was larger when using microbubbles at all pressures. In the presence of perfusion, only local injections provided a sufficiently high concentration of microbubbles necessary for significant temperature enhancement.

conclusionLocal injections of microbubbles provide a higher concentration of microbubbles in a smaller area, avoiding acoustic shadowing, and can lead to higher temperature elevation at lower pressures and increase the size of the heated area at all pressures.

Indexed as

High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound AblationHyperthermia, InducedAnimalsContrast MediaLiverMicrobubblesSwineUltrasonographyContrast MediaAcoustic shadowingHeated areaHigh-intensity focused ultrasoundHyperthermiaMicrobubblesPerfusionThermal lesionUltrasound contrast agents

Identifiers

PMID37246049
PMCPMC10330369
OpenAlexW4378364250

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.