ArticleMethods in enzymology2023
Structural elements that enable specificity for mutant EGFR kinase domains with next-generation small-molecule inhibitors.
Article in Methods in enzymology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor as a Model Drug Target for Scrutinizing the Status Quo in Drug Discovery and Chemical Biology.ACS bio & med chem Au · 2026Review
- Structural Studies of Fourth-Generation EGFR Inhibitors Reveal Insights into Selective T790M and C797S Targeting.ACS medicinal chemistry letters · 2026Article
- Deep mutational scanning reveals EGFR mutations conferring resistance to the 4th-generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor BLU-945.NPJ precision oncology · 2025Article
- Ascertaining a Structural Basis in Drug Discovery and Development.Journal of medicinal chemistry · 2025Article
- L858R/L718Q and L858R/L792H Mutations of EGFR Inducing Resistance Against Osimertinib by Forming Additional Hydrogen Bonds.Proteins · 2025Article
- Immunohistochemical characterization and potential prognostic relevance of dopamine signaling in canine pulmonary adenocarcinoma.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2025Article
- Tilting the Scales toward EGFR Mutant Selectivity: Expanding the Scope of Bivalent "Type V" Kinase Inhibitors.Journal of medicinal chemistry · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Specificity for a desired enzyme target is an essential property of small-molecule inhibitors. Molecules targeting oncogenic driver mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) kinase domain have had a considerable clinical impact due to their selective binding to cancer-causing mutants compared to wild type. Despite the availability of clinically approved drugs for cancers driven by EGFR mutants, persistent challenges in drug resistance in the past decades have led to newer generations of drugs with divergent chemical structures. The current clinical challenges are mainly due to acquired resistance to third-generation inhibitors, including by the acquisition of the C797S mutation. Several diverse fourth-generation candidates and tool compounds that inhibit the C797S mutant have emerged, and their structural characterization has revealed molecular factors that allow for EGFR mutant selective binding. Here, we have reviewed all known structurally-characterized EGFR TKIs targeting clinically-relevant mutations to identify specific features that enable C797S inhibition. Newer generation EGFR inhibitors exhibit consistent and previously underutilized hydrogen bonding interactions with the conserved K745 and D855 residue side chains. We also consider binding modes and hydrogen bonding interactions of inhibitors targeting the classical ATP and the more unique allosteric sites.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.