Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37245412›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in immunology2023

Visualising tapasin- and TAPBPR-assisted editing of major histocompatibility complex class-I immunopeptidomes.

Andy van Hateren, Tim Elliott

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in immunology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Andy van HaterenInstitute for Life Sciences and Centre for Cancer Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Building 85, Southampton SO17 1BJ, UK.
Tim ElliottCentre for Immuno-oncology and CAMS-Oxford Institute, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Old Road Campus, Headington, Oxford OX3 7BN, UK. Electronic address: tim.elliott@ndm.ox.ac.uk.
University of Oxford · GBUniversity of Southampton · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK 28279Cancer Research UK A28279
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Which peptides are selected for presentation by major histocompatibility complex class-I (MHC-I) molecules is a key determinant of successful immune responses. Peptide selection is co-ordinated by the tapasin and TAP Binding PRotein (TAPBPR) proteins, which ensure MHC-I molecules preferentially acquire high-affinity-binding peptides. New structural analyses have offered insight into how tapasin achieves this function within the peptide-loading complex (PLC) (comprising the Transporter associated with Antigen Presentation (TAP) peptide transporter, tapasin-ERp57, MHC-I and calreticulin), and how TAPBPR performs a peptide editing function independently of other molecules. The new structures reveal nuances in how tapasin and TAPBPR interact with MHC-I, and how calreticulin and ERp57 complement tapasin to exploit the plasticity of MHC-I molecules to achieve peptide editing.

Indexed as

CalreticulinCarrier ProteinsAntigen PresentationHistocompatibility Antigens Class IHLA AntigensHumansImmunoglobulinsMajor Histocompatibility ComplexMembrane Transport ProteinsPeptidesCalreticulinCarrier ProteinsHistocompatibility Antigens Class IHLA AntigensImmunoglobulinsMembrane Transport ProteinsPeptidestapasin

Identifiers

PMID37245412
PMCPMC11913765
OpenAlexW4378472711

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.