Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37245189›Full record

ArticleAdvances in therapy2023

Real-World Treatment Outcomes, Healthcare Resource Use, and Costs Associated with Antiemetics Among Cancer Patients on Cisplatin-Based Chemotherapy.

Rudolph M Navari, Winnie W Nelson, Sofia Shoaib, Risho Singh, Weiping Zhang, William L Bailey

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in therapy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Netupitant versus aprepitant: model-predicted neurokinin-1 receptor occupancy and implications for long-delayed nausea and vomiting prevention.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Rudolph M NavariWorld Health Organization, 4518 Crown Point Lane, Mount Olive, AL, 35117, USA.
Winnie W NelsonHelsinn Therapeutics (U.S.), Inc., 200 Wood Avenue South, Suite 100, Iselin, NJ, 08830, USA. winnie.nelson@helsinn.com.
Sofia ShoaibSTATinMED, LLC, 13101 Preston Road, Suite 110, #3395, Dallas, TX, 75240, USA.
Risho SinghSTATinMED, LLC, 13101 Preston Road, Suite 110, #3395, Dallas, TX, 75240, USA.
Weiping ZhangSTATinMED, LLC, 13101 Preston Road, Suite 110, #3395, Dallas, TX, 75240, USA.
William L BaileyHelsinn Therapeutics (U.S.), Inc., 200 Wood Avenue South, Suite 100, Iselin, NJ, 08830, USA.
STATinMED (United States) · USHelsinn Therapeutics (United States) · USUniversity of Mount Olive · US

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionChemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) is a recognized adverse outcome among patients with cancer. This retrospective study aimed to quantify the treatment outcomes, resource utilization, and costs associated with antiemetic use to prevent CINV in a broad US population who received cisplatin-based chemotherapy.

methodsData from the STATinMED RWD Insights Database was collected from January 1, 2015 to December 31, 2020. Cohorts included any patients that had at least one claim for fosnetupitant + palonosetron (NEPA) or fosaprepitant + palonosetron (APPA) and evidence of initiating cisplatin-based chemotherapy. Logistic regression was used to evaluate nausea and vomiting visits within 14 days after chemotherapy, and generalized linear models were used to examine all-cause and CINV-related healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and costs.

resultsNEPA was associated with significantly lower rates of nausea and vomiting visits after chemotherapy (p = 0.0001), including 86% greater odds of nausea and vomiting events for APPA during the second week after chemotherapy (odds ratio [OR] = 1.86; p = 0.0003). The mean numbers of all-cause inpatient visits (p = 0.0195) and CINV-related inpatient and outpatient visits were lower among NEPA patients (p < 0.0001). These differences corresponded to 57% of NEPA patients and 67% of APPA patients having one or more inpatient visits (p = 0.0002). All-cause outpatient costs and CINV-related inpatient costs were also significantly lower for NEPA (p < 0.0001). The mean number of all-cause outpatient visits, all-cause inpatient costs, and CINV-related outpatient costs was not significantly different between groups (p > 0.05).

conclusionIn this retrospective study based on claims data, NEPA was associated with lower rates of nausea and vomiting and lower CINV-related HCRU and costs compared to APPA following cisplatin-based chemotherapy. These results complement clinical trial data and published economic models supporting the use of NEPA as a safe, effective, and cost-saving antiemetic for patients undergoing chemotherapy.

Indexed as

AntiemeticsAntineoplastic AgentsNeoplasmsCisplatinDelivery of Health CareGastrointestinal AgentsHumansNauseaPalonosetronQuinuclidinesRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeVomitingAntiemeticsAntineoplastic AgentsCisplatinGastrointestinal AgentsPalonosetronQuinuclidinesAntiemeticCancerCisplatin-based chemotherapyFosaprepitantFosnetupitantHealthcare costsHealthcare resource utilizationNauseaPalonosetronVomiting

Identifiers

PMID37245189
PMCPMC10271895
OpenAlexW4378594586

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.