Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37245179›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2023

A methodology for the annotation of surgical videos for supervised machine learning applications.

Elizabeth Fischer, Kochai Jan Jawed, Kevin Cleary, Alan Balu, Andrew Donoho, Waverly Thompson Gestrich, Daniel A Donoho

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Elizabeth Fischer *Sheikh Zayed Institute for Pediatric Surgical Innovation, Children's National Hospital, Washington, DC, USA. emfischer2@childrensnational.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5967-3072
Kochai Jan Jawed *Sheikh Zayed Institute for Pediatric Surgical Innovation, Children's National Hospital, Washington, DC, USA.
Kevin ClearySheikh Zayed Institute for Pediatric Surgical Innovation, Children's National Hospital, Washington, DC, USA.
Alan BaluDivision of Neurosurgery, Center for Neuroscience and Behavioral Medicine, Children's National Hospital, Washington, DC, USA.
Andrew DonohoSurgicalvideo.io, Austin, TX, USA.
Waverly Thompson GestrichDivision of Emergency Trauma and Burn Surgery, Children's National Hospital, Washington, DC, USA.
Daniel A DonohoGeorgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC, USA.
Children's National · USGeorgetown University · USObjectVideo (United States) · US

Funding

Video Analysis of Neurosurgical Technical Performance and Adverse EventsK23EB034110 · NIBIB · CHILDREN'S RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI DONOHO, DANIEL A. · 2022 to 2025
$640k
NIBIB NIH HHS 1K23EB034110-01NIBIB NIH HHS K23 EB034110
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeSurgical data science is an emerging field focused on quantitative analysis of pre-, intra-, and postoperative patient data (Maier-Hein et al. in Med Image Anal 76: 102306, 2022). Data science approaches can decompose complex procedures, train surgical novices, assess outcomes of actions, and create predictive models of surgical outcomes (Marcus et al. in Pituitary 24: 839-853, 2021; Røadsch et al. in Nat Mach Intell, 2022). Surgical videos contain powerful signals of events that may impact patient outcomes. A necessary step before the deployment of supervised machine learning methods is the development of labels for objects and anatomy. We describe a complete method for annotating videos of transsphenoidal surgery.

methodsEndoscopic video recordings of transsphenoidal pituitary tumor removal surgeries were collected from a multicenter research collaborative. These videos were anonymized and stored in a cloud-based platform. Videos were uploaded to an online annotation platform. Annotation framework was developed based on a literature review and surgical observations to ensure proper understanding of the tools, anatomy, and steps present. A user guide was developed to trained annotators to ensure standardization.

resultsA fully annotated video of a transsphenoidal pituitary tumor removal surgery was produced. This annotated video included over 129,826 frames. To prevent any missing annotations, all frames were later reviewed by highly experienced annotators and a surgeon reviewer. Iterations to annotated videos allowed for the creation of an annotated video complete with labeled surgical tools, anatomy, and phases. In addition, a user guide was developed for the training of novice annotators, which provides information about the annotation software to ensure the production of standardized annotations.

conclusionsA standardized and reproducible workflow for managing surgical video data is a necessary prerequisite to surgical data science applications. We developed a standard methodology for annotating surgical videos that may facilitate the quantitative analysis of videos using machine learning applications. Future work will demonstrate the clinical relevance and impact of this workflow by developing process modeling and outcome predictors.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsPituitary NeoplasmsEndoscopyHumansMachine LearningMulticenter Studies as TopicSupervised Machine LearningEndoscopic surgeryOperative patient dataSurgical data scienceSurgical video annotation

Identifiers

PMID37245179
OpenAlexW4378570617

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.