ArticleEuropean biophysics journal : EBJ2023
Comparison of three AUC techniques for the determination of the loading status and capsid titer of AAVs.
Article in European biophysics journal : EBJ, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Quantifying the Full-to-Empty Adeno-Associated Virus (AAV) Capsid Ratios and Their Impact on Transduction Efficiency in vitro.The AAPS journal · 2025Article
- Quantification of full and empty particles of adeno-associated virus vectors via a novel dual fluorescence-linked immunosorbent assay.Molecular therapy. Methods & clinical development · 2024Article
- Flotation Coefficient Distributions of Lipid Nanoparticles by Sedimentation Velocity Analytical Ultracentrifugation.ACS nano · 2024Article
- Characterization and quantification of adeno-associated virus capsid-loading states by multi-wavelength analytical ultracentrifugation with UltraScan.Nanomedicine (London, England) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Due to the rise of adeno-associated viruses (AAVs) as gene therapy delivery vectors, boundary sedimentation velocity analytical ultracentrifugation (boundary SV-AUC) has been developed into a widely used quality control assay even for release analytics. It can be considered as the "gold standard" for the determination of the loading status of empty, partially filled, and full capsids especially when conducted in multiwavelength (MWL) mode. It can be considered to provide the most accurate determination of the loading status, and it also provides information on the capsid titer, aggregates, and potential contaminants such as free DNA. MWL boundary SV-AUC can be regarded as a multi-attribute (MAM) method for the characterization of AAVs. One major drawback of the method is the high sample consumption both in terms of concentration and volume. Here, we compare two alternative AUC techniques, band SV-AUC and analytical CsCl density gradient sedimentation equilibrium AUC (CsCl SE-AUC) with the boundary SV-AUC and the MWL-SV-AUC experiment. Our data show a high consistency of the determined full/empty ratios between these techniques if the appropriate wavelengths and extinction coefficients are used.
Indexed as
Identifiers
37245172What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.