Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37244962›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Dynamic calibration with approximate Bayesian computation for a microsimulation of disease spread.

Molly Asher, Nik Lomax, Karyn Morrissey, Fiona Spooner, Nick Malleson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Personalizing computational models to construct medical digital twins.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2025
    Article
  5. Personalizing computational models to construct medical digital twins.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Molly AsherSchool of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK.
Nik LomaxSchool of Geography, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK.
Karyn MorrisseyDepartment of Management, DTU Technical University of Denmark, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Fiona SpoonerOur World in Data, Global Change Data Lab, Oxford, UK.
Nick MallesonSchool of Geography, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK. n.s.malleson@leeds.ac.uk.

Funding

European Research Council 757455
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The global COVID-19 pandemic brought considerable public and policy attention to the field of infectious disease modelling. A major hurdle that modellers must overcome, particularly when models are used to develop policy, is quantifying the uncertainty in a model's predictions. By including the most recent available data in a model, the quality of its predictions can be improved and uncertainties reduced. This paper adapts an existing, large-scale, individual-based COVID-19 model to explore the benefits of updating the model in pseudo-real time. We use Approximate Bayesian Computation (ABC) to dynamically recalibrate the model's parameter values as new data emerge. ABC offers advantages over alternative calibration methods by providing information about the uncertainty associated with particular parameter values and the resulting COVID-19 predictions through posterior distributions. Analysing such distributions is crucial in fully understanding a model and its outputs. We find that forecasts of future disease infection rates are improved substantially by incorporating up-to-date observations and that the uncertainty in forecasts drops considerably in later simulation windows (as the model is provided with additional data). This is an important outcome because the uncertainty in model predictions is often overlooked when models are used in policy.

Indexed as

COVID-19PandemicsBayes TheoremCalibrationComputer SimulationHumans

Identifiers

PMID37244962
PMCPMC10221755

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.