Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37244940›Full record

ArticleNature communications2023

Deep learning enables satellite-based monitoring of large populations of terrestrial mammals across heterogeneous landscape.

Zijing Wu, Ce Zhang, Xiaowei Gu, Isla Duporge, Lacey F Hughey, Jared A Stabach, Andrew K Skidmore, J Grant C Hopcraft, Stephen J Lee, Peter M Atkinson and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. From data to decisions: The role of machine learning in precision ecological restoration.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Zijing Wu *Department of Natural Resources, Faculty of Geo-Information Science and Earth Observation, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-2582-9646
Ce Zhang *Lancaster Environment Center, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5100-3584
Xiaowei Gu *School of Computing, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9116-4761
Isla Duporge *Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8463-2459
Lacey F HugheyConservation Ecology Center, Smithsonian National Zoo and Conservation Biology Institute, Front Royal, VA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8911-4001
Jared A StabachConservation Ecology Center, Smithsonian National Zoo and Conservation Biology Institute, Front Royal, VA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7896-1237
Andrew K SkidmoreDepartment of Natural Resources, Faculty of Geo-Information Science and Earth Observation, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-7446-8429
J Grant C HopcraftInstitute of Biodiversity, Animal Health, and Comparative Medicine, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9617-9951
Stephen J LeeU.S. Army Research Laboratory, Army Research Office, Durham, NC, USA.
Peter M AtkinsonLancaster Environment Center, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK.
Douglas J McCauleyDepartment of Ecology, Evolution and Marine Biology, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA, USA.
Richard LampreyDepartment of Natural Resources, Faculty of Geo-Information Science and Earth Observation, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-1549-1570
Shadrack NgeneWildlife Research and Training Institute, Naivasha, Kenya.
Tiejun WangDepartment of Natural Resources, Faculty of Geo-Information Science and Earth Observation, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands. t.wang@utwente.nl.ORCID 0000-0002-1138-8464

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

New satellite remote sensing and machine learning techniques offer untapped possibilities to monitor global biodiversity with unprecedented speed and precision. These efficiencies promise to reveal novel ecological insights at spatial scales which are germane to the management of populations and entire ecosystems. Here, we present a robust transferable deep learning pipeline to automatically locate and count large herds of migratory ungulates (wildebeest and zebra) in the Serengeti-Mara ecosystem using fine-resolution (38-50 cm) satellite imagery. The results achieve accurate detection of nearly 500,000 individuals across thousands of square kilometers and multiple habitat types, with an overall F1-score of 84.75% (Precision: 87.85%, Recall: 81.86%). This research demonstrates the capability of satellite remote sensing and machine learning techniques to automatically and accurately count very large populations of terrestrial mammals across a highly heterogeneous landscape. We also discuss the potential for satellite-derived species detections to advance basic understanding of animal behavior and ecology.

Indexed as

Deep LearningEcosystemAnimalsBiodiversityMammalsRemote Sensing Technology

Identifiers

PMID37244940
PMCPMC10224963

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.