Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37244933›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Machine learning based estimation of dynamic balance and gait adaptability in persons with neurological diseases using inertial sensors.

Piergiuseppe Liuzzi, Ilaria Carpinella, Denise Anastasi, Elisa Gervasoni, Tiziana Lencioni, Rita Bertoni, Maria Chiara Carrozza, Davide Cattaneo, Maurizio Ferrarin, Andrea Mannini

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
16.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. AI in Rehabilitation Medicine: Opportunities and Challenges.Annals of rehabilitation medicine · 2023
    Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Piergiuseppe LiuzziAIRLab, IRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi ONLUS, 50143, Florence, Italy.
Ilaria CarpinellaLAMoBIR and LaRiCE, IRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi ONLUS, 20148, Milan, Italy. icarpinella@dongnocchi.it.
Denise AnastasiLAMoBIR and LaRiCE, IRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi ONLUS, 20148, Milan, Italy.
Elisa GervasoniLAMoBIR and LaRiCE, IRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi ONLUS, 20148, Milan, Italy.
Tiziana LencioniLAMoBIR and LaRiCE, IRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi ONLUS, 20148, Milan, Italy.
Rita BertoniLAMoBIR and LaRiCE, IRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi ONLUS, 20148, Milan, Italy.
Maria Chiara CarrozzaScuola Superiore Sant'Anna, Istituto di BioRobotica, 56025, Pontedera, Italy.
Davide CattaneoLAMoBIR and LaRiCE, IRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi ONLUS, 20148, Milan, Italy.
Maurizio Ferrarin *LAMoBIR and LaRiCE, IRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi ONLUS, 20148, Milan, Italy.
Andrea Mannini *AIRLab, IRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi ONLUS, 50143, Florence, Italy.
Don Carlo Gnocchi Foundation · ITScuola Superiore Sant'Anna · ITInternational Flame Research Foundation · ITUniversity of Milan · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Poor dynamic balance and impaired gait adaptation to different contexts are hallmarks of people with neurological disorders (PwND), leading to difficulties in daily life and increased fall risk. Frequent assessment of dynamic balance and gait adaptability is therefore essential for monitoring the evolution of these impairments and/or the long-term effects of rehabilitation. The modified dynamic gait index (mDGI) is a validated clinical test specifically devoted to evaluating gait facets in clinical settings under a physiotherapist's supervision. The need of a clinical environment, consequently, limits the number of assessments. Wearable sensors are increasingly used to measure balance and locomotion in real-world contexts and may permit an increase in monitoring frequency. This study aims to provide a preliminary test of this opportunity by using nested cross-validated machine learning regressors to predict the mDGI scores of 95 PwND via inertial signals collected from short steady-state walking bouts derived from the 6-minute walk test. Four different models were compared, one for each pathology (multiple sclerosis, Parkinson's disease, and stroke) and one for the pooled multipathological cohort. Model explanations were computed on the best-performing solution; the model trained on the multipathological cohort yielded a median (interquartile range) absolute test error of 3.58 (5.38) points. In total, 76% of the predictions were within the mDGI's minimal detectable change of 5 points. These results confirm that steady-state walking measurements provide information about dynamic balance and gait adaptability and can help clinicians identify important features to improve upon during rehabilitation. Future developments will include training of the method using short steady-state walking bouts in real-world settings, analysing the feasibility of this solution to intensify performance monitoring, providing prompt detection of worsening/improvements, and complementing clinical assessments.

Indexed as

Parkinson DiseaseStrokeGaitHumansLocomotionPostural BalanceWalking

Identifiers

PMID37244933
PMCPMC10224964
OpenAlexW4378575759

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.