Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37244891›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Memory, perceptual, and motor costs affect the strength of categorical encoding during motor learning of object properties.

Evan Cesanek, J Randall Flanagan, Daniel M Wolpert

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Evan CesanekMortimer B. Zuckerman Mind Brain Behavior Institute, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA. evan.cesanek@gmail.com.
J Randall FlanaganDepartment of Psychology, Centre for Neuroscience Studies, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, K7L 3N6, Canada.
Daniel M WolpertMortimer B. Zuckerman Mind Brain Behavior Institute, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.

Funding

Modeling multi-area dynamics during motor controlU19NS104649 · NINDS · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI JESSELL, THOMAS M. · 2017 to 2021
$15.3M
Computations in Human Motor LearningR01NS117699 · NINDS · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI WOLPERT, DANIEL · 2021 to 2025
$2.5M
NIH HHS R01NS117699NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS117699NINDS NIH HHS U19 NS104649
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nearly all tasks of daily life involve skilled object manipulation, and successful manipulation requires knowledge of object dynamics. We recently developed a motor learning paradigm that reveals the categorical organization of motor memories of object dynamics. When participants repeatedly lift a constant-density "family" of cylindrical objects that vary in size, and then an outlier object with a greater density is interleaved into the sequence of lifts, they often fail to learn the weight of the outlier, persistently treating it as a family member despite repeated errors. Here we examine eight factors (Similarity, Cardinality, Frequency, History, Structure, Stochasticity, Persistence, and Time Pressure) that could influence the formation and retrieval of category representations in the outlier paradigm. In our web-based task, participants (N = 240) anticipated object weights by stretching a virtual spring attached to the top of each object. Using Bayesian t-tests, we analyze the relative impact of each manipulated factor on categorical encoding (strengthen, weaken, or no effect). Our results suggest that category representations of object weight are automatic, rigid, and linear and, as a consequence, the key determinant of whether an outlier is encoded as a member of the family is its discriminability from the family members.

Indexed as

Hand StrengthMemoryBayes TheoremHumansLearning

Identifiers

PMID37244891
PMCPMC10224949

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.