Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37244638›Full record

Trial reportAmerican journal of obstetrics & gynecology MFM2023

Association of duration of skin-to-skin contact after cesarean delivery in China: a superiority, multicentric randomized controlled trial.

Xiaosong Zhang, Xueyin Wang, Juan Juan, Huixia Yang, Howard Lawrence Sobel, Zhao Li, Anuradha Narayan, Xiaona Huang, Xiaobo Tian, Lin Zhang and 5 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialEquivalence Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in American journal of obstetrics & gynecology MFM, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 7 institutions in 5 countries.

Xiaosong ZhangDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China (Drs X Zhang, Wang, Juan, and Yang and Ms Liu).
Xueyin WangDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China (Drs X Zhang, Wang, Juan, and Yang and Ms Liu).
Juan JuanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China (Drs X Zhang, Wang, Juan, and Yang and Ms Liu).
Huixia YangDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China (Drs X Zhang, Wang, Juan, and Yang and Ms Liu). Electronic address: yanghuixia@bjmu.edu.cn.
Howard Lawrence SobelMaternal and Child Health and Quality and Safety, World Health Organization Regional Office for the Western Pacific, Metro Manila, Philippines (Dr Sobel and Ms Li). Electronic address: sobelh@who.int.
Zhao LiMaternal and Child Health and Quality and Safety, World Health Organization Regional Office for the Western Pacific, Metro Manila, Philippines (Dr Sobel and Ms Li).
Anuradha NarayanUnited Nations Children's Fund China, Beijing, China (Ms Narayan, Dr Huang, and Mr Tian).
Xiaona HuangUnited Nations Children's Fund China, Beijing, China (Ms Narayan, Dr Huang, and Mr Tian).
Xiaobo TianUnited Nations Children's Fund China, Beijing, China (Ms Narayan, Dr Huang, and Mr Tian).
Lin ZhangSave the Children International (United Kingdom) Beijing Representative Office, Beijing, China (Ms L Zhang).
Yinli CaoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Northwest Women's and Children's Hospital, Shaanxi, China (Ms Cao).
Ling TanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sichuan Provincial Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital, Chengdu, China (Mses Tan and Gao).
Yan GaoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sichuan Provincial Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital, Chengdu, China (Mses Tan and Gao).
Yinping QiuDepartment of Neonatology, General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, China (Ms Qui).
Jun LiuDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China (Drs X Zhang, Wang, Juan, and Yang and Ms Liu).
Peking University · CNUnited Nations Children's Fund · USMaternal and Child Health Hospital of Sichuan Province · CNWorld Health Organization Regional Office for the Western Pacific · PHNingxia Medical University · CNNorthwest Women's and Children's Hospital · CNSave the Children · US

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn China, the rates of early initiation and exclusive breastfeeding are low. The high cesarean delivery rates further contribute to low breastfeeding outcomes. Skin-to-skin contact, a key component of early essential newborn care, is known to be associated with improved breastfeeding initiation and exclusivity; however, the necessary duration has not been subjected to a randomized control trial.

objectiveThis study aimed to determine the association of the duration of skin-to-skin contact after cesarean delivery with breastfeeding outcomes and maternal and neonatal health outcomes in China. STUDY

designThis was a multicentric randomized controlled trial that was conducted at 4 hospitals in China. A total of 720 participants at ≥37 gestational weeks with a singleton pregnancy and who received an elective cesarean delivery with epidural anesthesia or spinal anesthesia or combined spinal-epidural anesthesia were randomly divided into 4 groups at a ratio of 1:1:1:1. The control group received routine care. Intervention group 1 (G1), 2 (G2), and 3 (G3) received 30, 60, and 90 minutes of skin-to-skin contact immediately after the cesarean delivery, respectively.

resultsBetween January 3 and October 14, 2021, 659 participants were recruited, including 173 in the control group, 176 in G1, 146 in G2, and 164 in G3. Among G1, G2, and G3, the rate of early initiation of breastfeeding within 60 minutes of birth was 56%, 71%, and 72%, respectively, compared with 22% in the control group (P<.001). The exclusive breastfeeding rate at discharge was 69%, 62%, and 71%, respectively, compared with 57% in the control group (P=.003). Early essential newborn care practices were associated with a reduction in postpartum blood loss and neonatal intensive care unit or neonatal ward admission (P<.001; P=.022) .

conclusionOur findings highlight that prolonged skin-to-skin contact after a cesarean delivery was associated with higher initiation and exclusive breastfeeding at discharge rates. It also found associations with reduced postpartum blood loss and neonatal intensive care unit or neonatal ward admission.

Indexed as

Anesthesia, EpiduralCesarean SectionBreast FeedingFemaleHospitalizationHumansInfant, NewbornPatient DischargePregnancycesarean deliveryearly essential newborn careearly initiation breastfeedingexclusive breastfeedingskin-to-skin contact

Identifiers

PMID37244638
PMCPMC10410304
OpenAlexW4378188555

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.