GuidelineInternational journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics2023
Operational Ontology for Oncology (O3): A Professional Society-Based, Multistakeholder, Consensus-Driven Informatics Standard Supporting Clinical and Research Use of Real-World Data From Patients Treated for Cancer.
Guideline in International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.
- Technical Considerations on Proton Therapy in NRG's Multi-Institutional Clinical Trials.International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics · 2026Guideline
- Operational Ontology for Radiology: A Framework for Profiling and Characterizing CT Imaging Data.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Article
- Optimizing the delivery of radiotherapy with artificial intelligence.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2026Review
- Integrating Heterogeneous Real-World Cancer Data for Semantic Interoperability in Oncology and Medical Imaging: Development and Validation of the Cancer Image Europe Hyperontology.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Operationalizing the EU AI Act in a comprehensive cancer center through an institutional governance framework.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Review
- The complementary roles of oversight, education, and collaboration in the responsible integration of artificial intelligence in radiation medicine: White paper of CADRA.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2026Review
- An international multi-centre study to develop and validate federated learning-based prognostic models for anal cancer.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Thoracic reirradiation clinical and technical practices: a survey from the reirradiation Collaborative Group (ReCOG).Clinical and translational radiation oncology · 2026Article
- Reirradiation practices of Radiation Therapists (RePoRT) study.Technical innovations & patient support in radiation oncology · 2025Article
- Embracing the Future of Clinical Trials in Radiation Therapy: An NRG Oncology CIRO Technology Retreat Whitepaper on Pioneering Technologies and AI-Driven Solutions.International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics · 2025Review
- Improved Survival and Prognostication in Melanoma Patients With Brain Metastases: An Update of the Melanoma Graded Prognostic Assessment.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2025Article
- Continuous multimodal data supply chain and expandable clinical decision support for oncology.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- Data Science Opportunities To Improve Radiotherapy Planning and Clinical Decision Making.Seminars in radiation oncology · 2024Review
- Navigating the Complexities of Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Real-World Data Collection for Oncology Pharmacovigilance.JCO clinical cancer informatics · 2024Article
- Prospective evaluation of artificial intelligence (AI) applications for use in cancer pathways following diagnosis: a systematic review.BMJ oncology · 2024Review
- Cancer Informatics for Cancer Centers: Sharing Ideas on How to Build an Artificial Intelligence-Ready Informatics Ecosystem for Radiation Oncology.JCO clinical cancer informatics · 2023Article
- Identification of Key Elements in Prostate Cancer for Ontology Building via a Multidisciplinary Consensus Agreement.Cancers · 2023Article
- Best Practice Guidelines for Use of Reference Points in Radiation Oncology Information Systems to Aggregate Longitudinal Dosimetric Data.Practical radiation oncologyArticle
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
53 authors at 20 institutions in 6 countries.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThe ongoing lack of data standardization severely undermines the potential for automated learning from the vast amount of information routinely archived in electronic health records (EHRs), radiation oncology information systems, treatment planning systems, and other cancer care and outcomes databases. We sought to create a standardized ontology for clinical data, social determinants of health, and other radiation oncology concepts and interrelationships. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The American Association of Physicists in Medicine's Big Data Science Committee was initiated in July 2019 to explore common ground from the stakeholders' collective experience of issues that typically compromise the formation of large inter- and intra-institutional databases from EHRs. The Big Data Science Committee adopted an iterative, cyclical approach to engaging stakeholders beyond its membership to optimize the integration of diverse perspectives from the community.
resultsWe developed the Operational Ontology for Oncology (O3), which identified 42 key elements, 359 attributes, 144 value sets, and 155 relationships ranked in relative importance of clinical significance, likelihood of availability in EHRs, and the ability to modify routine clinical processes to permit aggregation. Recommendations are provided for best use and development of the O3 to 4 constituencies: device manufacturers, centers of clinical care, researchers, and professional societies.
conclusionsO3 is designed to extend and interoperate with existing global infrastructure and data science standards. The implementation of these recommendations will lower the barriers for aggregation of information that could be used to create large, representative, findable, accessible, interoperable, and reusable data sets to support the scientific objectives of grant programs. The construction of comprehensive "real-world" data sets and application of advanced analytical techniques, including artificial intelligence, holds the potential to revolutionize patient management and improve outcomes by leveraging increased access to information derived from larger, more representative data sets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.