Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37244370›Full record

ArticleBrain stimulation

Dynamic amplitude modulation of microstimulation evokes biomimetic onset and offset transients and reduces depression of evoked calcium responses in sensory cortices.

Christopher Hughes, Takashi Kozai

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain stimulation. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Chronic alteration of CaBiomaterials · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Integration of learned artificial sensation with vision during freely moving navigation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Chronic alteration of CabioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Christopher HughesDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, USA; Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition, USA.
Takashi KozaiDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, USA; Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition, USA; Department of Neuroscience, University of Pittsburgh, USA; McGowan Institute for Regenerative Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; NeuroTech Center, University of Pittsburgh Brain Institute, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. Electronic address: tk.kozai@pitt.edu.
University of Pittsburgh · US

Funding

Training in the Neurobiology of Neurological DiseaseT32NS086749 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI Omar El Gharbawie, REBECCA P SEAL · 2014 to 2026
$4.8M
Using Electrical Stimulation to Modulation Microglia and the Conversion of Microglia PhenotypesR01NS115707 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI KOZAI, TAKASHI DANIEL YOSHIDA · 2020 to 2024
$3.2M
Subcellular Wireless Axons for in vivo Localized Neuronal ExcitationR01NS105691 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI Takashi Daniel Yoshida Kozai, Wen Li · 2020 to 2026
$3.1M
Mechanisms of Oligodendrocyte Activity on Chronic Brain Implants and Recording PerformanceR01NS129632 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI FRANCA CAMBI, Takashi Daniel Yoshida Kozai · 2023 to 2026
$2.4M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS105691NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS115707NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS129632NINDS NIH HHS T32 NS086749
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIntracortical microstimulation (ICMS) is an emerging approach to restore sensation to people with neurological injury or disease. Biomimetic microstimulation, or stimulus trains that mimic neural activity in the brain through encoding of onset and offset transients, could improve the utility of ICMS for brain-computer interface (BCI) applications, but how biomimetic microstimulation affects neural activation is not understood. Current "biomimetic" ICMS trains aim to reproduce the strong onset and offset transients evoked in the brain by sensory input through dynamic modulation of stimulus parameters. Stimulus induced depression of neural activity (decreases in evoked intensity over time) is also a potential barrier to clinical implementation of sensory feedback, and dynamic microstimulation may reduce this effect.

objectiveWe evaluated how bio-inspired ICMS trains with dynamic modulation of amplitude and/or frequency change the calcium response, spatial distribution, and depression of neurons in the somatosensory and visual cortices.

methodsCalcium responses of neurons were measured in Layer 2/3 of visual and somatosensory cortices of anesthetized GCaMP6s mice in response to ICMS trains with fixed amplitude and frequency (Fixed) and three dynamic ICMS trains that increased the stimulation intensity during the onset and offset of stimulation by modulating the amplitude (DynAmp), frequency (DynFreq), or amplitude and frequency (DynBoth). ICMS was provided for either 1-s with 4-s breaks (Short) or for 30-s with 15-s breaks (Long).

resultsDynAmp and DynBoth trains evoked distinct onset and offset transients in recruited neural populations, while DynFreq trains evoked population activity similar to Fixed trains. Individual neurons had heterogeneous responses primarily based on how quickly they depressed to ICMS, where neurons farther from the electrode depressed faster and a small subpopulation (1-5%) were modulated by DynFreq trains. Neurons that depressed to Short trains were also more likely to depress to Long trains, but Long trains induced more depression overall due to the increased stimulation length. Increasing the amplitude during the hold phase resulted in an increase in recruitment and intensity which resulted in more depression and reduced offset responses. Dynamic amplitude modulation reduced stimulation induced depression by 14.6 ± 0.3% for Short and 36.1 ± 0.6% for Long trains. Ideal observers were 0.031 ± 0.009 s faster for onset detection and 1.33 ± 0.21 s faster for offset detection with dynamic amplitude encoding.

conclusionsDynamic amplitude modulation evokes distinct onset and offset transients, reduces depression of neural calcium activity, and decreases total charge injection for sensory feedback in BCIs by lowering recruitment of neurons during long maintained periods of ICMS. In contrast, dynamic frequency modulation evokes distinct onset and offset transients in a small subpopulation of neurons but also reduces depression in recruited neurons by reducing the rate of activation.

Indexed as

CalciumNeuronsAnimalsBrainElectric StimulationMiceMicroelectrodesSomatosensory CortexCalciumBrain-computer interfacesCerebral cortexIntracortical microstimulationNeural adaptationSensory neuroprosthesesTwo-photon microscopy

Identifiers

PMID37244370
PMCPMC10330928
OpenAlexW4378189447

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.