ArticleProtein science : a publication of the Protein Society2023
Correspondence between functional scores from deep mutational scans and predicted effects on protein stability.
Article in Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed.
- Collective Variable-Guided Engineering of the Free-Energy Surface of a Small Peptide.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2026Article
- Overestimating zero-shot fitness prediction: Broad benchmarks mask local failures and practical limitations.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Article
- Machine learning framework for cost effective deep mutational scanning through targeted substitution profiling.BMC bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Directed evolution of enzymes at the crossroads of tradition and innovation.FEBS open bio · 2026Review
- Supervised learning of protein variant effects across large-scale mutagenesis datasets.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2026Article
- A structure-guided approach to noncoding variant evaluation for transcription factor binding using AlphaFold 3.Nucleic acids research · 2026Article
- Uncovering the molecular basis of kinase activity and substrate recognition with phospho-PCA.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Enriching stabilizing mutations through automated analysis of molecular dynamics simulations using BoostMut.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2025Article
- Prevalence of loss-of-function, gain-of-function and dominant-negative mechanisms across genetic disease phenotypes.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Biophysics-based protein language models for protein engineering.Nature methods · 2025Article
- GnomAD Missense Variants of Uncertain Significance: Implications for p53 Stability and Phosphorylation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Dissecting the effects of single amino acid substitutions in SARS-CoV-2 Mpro.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2025Article
- Structural biology in variant interpretation: Perspectives and practices from two studies.American journal of human genetics · 2025Review
- Biophysics-based protein language models for protein engineering.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Variant effect predictor correlation with functional assays is reflective of clinical classification performance.Genome biology · 2025Article
- Complementary Roles of Structure and Variant Effect Predictors in RyR1 Clinical Interpretation.Human mutation · 2025Article
- Using AI-predicted protein structures as a reference to predict loss-of-function activity in tumor suppressor breast cancer genes.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024Article
- Protein structural context of cancer mutations reveals molecular mechanisms and candidate driver genes.Cell reports · 2024Article
- SSEmb: A joint embedding of protein sequence and structure enables robust variant effect predictions.Nature communications · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Many methodologically diverse computational methods have been applied to the growing challenge of predicting and interpreting the effects of protein variants. As many pathogenic mutations have a perturbing effect on protein stability or intermolecular interactions, one highly interpretable approach is to use protein structural information to model the physical impacts of variants and predict their likely effects on protein stability and interactions. Previous efforts have assessed the accuracy of stability predictors in reproducing thermodynamically accurate values and evaluated their ability to distinguish between known pathogenic and benign mutations. Here, we take an alternate approach, and explore how well stability predictor scores correlate with functional impacts derived from deep mutational scanning (DMS) experiments. In this work, we compare the predictions of 9 protein stability-based tools against mutant protein fitness values from 49 independent DMS datasets, covering 170,940 unique single amino acid variants. We find that FoldX and Rosetta show the strongest correlations with DMS-based functional scores, similar to their previous top performance in distinguishing between pathogenic and benign variants. For both methods, performance is considerably improved when considering intermolecular interactions from protein complex structures, when available. Furthermore, using these two predictors, we derive a "Foldetta" consensus score, which improves upon the performance of both, and manages to match dedicated variant effect predictors in reflecting variant functional impacts. Finally, we also highlight that predicted stability effects show consistently higher correlations with certain DMS experimental phenotypes, particularly those based upon protein abundance, and, in certain cases, can significantly outcompete sequence-based variant effect prediction methodologies for predicting functional scores from DMS experiments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.