Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37243972›Full record

ArticleProtein science : a publication of the Protein Society2023

Correspondence between functional scores from deep mutational scans and predicted effects on protein stability.

Lukas Gerasimavicius, Benjamin J Livesey, Joseph A Marsh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Supervised learning of protein variant effects across large-scale mutagenesis datasets.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Dissecting the effects of single amino acid substitutions in SARS-CoV-2 Mpro.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2025
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Biophysics-based protein language models for protein engineering.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lukas GerasimaviciusMRC Human Genetics Unit, Institute of Genetics & Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6874-3850
Benjamin J LiveseyMRC Human Genetics Unit, Institute of Genetics & Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Joseph A MarshMRC Human Genetics Unit, Institute of Genetics & Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4132-0628

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many methodologically diverse computational methods have been applied to the growing challenge of predicting and interpreting the effects of protein variants. As many pathogenic mutations have a perturbing effect on protein stability or intermolecular interactions, one highly interpretable approach is to use protein structural information to model the physical impacts of variants and predict their likely effects on protein stability and interactions. Previous efforts have assessed the accuracy of stability predictors in reproducing thermodynamically accurate values and evaluated their ability to distinguish between known pathogenic and benign mutations. Here, we take an alternate approach, and explore how well stability predictor scores correlate with functional impacts derived from deep mutational scanning (DMS) experiments. In this work, we compare the predictions of 9 protein stability-based tools against mutant protein fitness values from 49 independent DMS datasets, covering 170,940 unique single amino acid variants. We find that FoldX and Rosetta show the strongest correlations with DMS-based functional scores, similar to their previous top performance in distinguishing between pathogenic and benign variants. For both methods, performance is considerably improved when considering intermolecular interactions from protein complex structures, when available. Furthermore, using these two predictors, we derive a "Foldetta" consensus score, which improves upon the performance of both, and manages to match dedicated variant effect predictors in reflecting variant functional impacts. Finally, we also highlight that predicted stability effects show consistently higher correlations with certain DMS experimental phenotypes, particularly those based upon protein abundance, and, in certain cases, can significantly outcompete sequence-based variant effect prediction methodologies for predicting functional scores from DMS experiments.

Indexed as

Amino AcidsProteinsMutationProtein StabilityAmino AcidsProteinsdeep mutational scanningmultiplexed assay of variant effectsmutationsprotein stabilityvariant effect predictors

Identifiers

PMID37243972
PMCPMC10273344

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.