Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37243863›Full record

ArticleAdvances in therapy2023

Clinician Preferences for Oxybate Treatment for Narcolepsy: Survey and Discrete Choice Experiment.

Anne Marie Morse, Lois Krahn, Julie Flygare, Clete Kushida, Michael J Thorpy, Amod Athavale, Jennifer Gudeman

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in therapy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Optimizing patient outcomes and empowering the patient-clinician partnership.Sleep advances : a journal of the Sleep Research Society · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Anne Marie MorseGeisinger Commonwealth School of Medicine, Geisinger Medical Center, Janet Weis Children's Hospital, Danville, PA, USA.
Lois KrahnMayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
Julie FlygarePatient author, Project Sleep, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Clete KushidaStanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA, USA.
Michael J ThorpyMontefiore Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Amod AthavaleTrinity Life Sciences, Waltham, MA, USA.
Jennifer GudemanAvadel Pharmaceuticals, 16640 Chesterfield Grove Road, Suite 200, Chesterfield, MO, 63005, USA. jgudeman@avadel.com.
Geisinger Commonwealth School of Medicine · USMayo Clinic Hospital · USMontefiore Medical Center · USStanford University · USTrinity Health · USUniversity of Chester · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionImmediate-release sodium oxybate (SXB) has been Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved to treat narcolepsy since 2002; in 2020, a mixed-salt oxybates formulation was also approved. Both are taken at bedtime with a second dose taken 2.5-4 h later. A third oxybate option, an investigational extended-release SXB, may soon be available. This study was undertaken to understand clinicians' preferences between these 3 different oxybate treatments.

methodsClinicians in active clinical practice for 3-35 years and experience treating patients with narcolepsy were recruited. A 30-min web-based survey quantified narcolepsy disease-state attitudes, treatment perceptions, and satisfaction with oxybates on 9-point scales. A discrete choice experiment (DCE) of 12 choice sets, with 2 hypothetical treatment profiles in each, was used to capture clinician preferences about overall oxybate therapy preference, impact on patient quality of life (QoL), and patient anxiety/stress. Attributes associated with current therapies and those expected to be available in the near future were included in the design.

resultsThe clinicians surveyed (n = 100) indicated that narcolepsy has a negative impact on patient QoL (mean rating, 7.7) and rated impact on QoL and treatment efficacy as the most important aspects of a narcolepsy treatment (mean rating, 7.3-7.7). Clinicians with experience prescribing oxybates had moderately high satisfaction with SXB and mixed-salt oxybates efficacy (mean ratings, 6.5-6.9) and safety (mean ratings, 6.1-6.7) and lower satisfaction with nightly dosing frequency (mean rating, 5.9 and 6.3, respectively). In the DCE, dosing frequency was the most important attribute driving overall product choice, patient QoL, and reducing patient anxiety/stress (relative attribute importance, 46.1, 41.7, and 44.0, respectively), with once nightly preferred over twice nightly.

conclusionClinicians indicated a significantly higher preference for the once-at-bedtime dosing schedule versus twice nightly in selecting oxybate therapies overall and when aiming to improve patient QoL or reduce patient anxiety.

Indexed as

NarcolepsySodium OxybateHumansQuality of LifeSurveys and QuestionnairesTreatment OutcomeSodium OxybateAnxietyClinician preferenceDiscrete choice experimentMixed-salt oxybatesNarcolepsyOnce-nightlyQuality of lifeSodium oxybate

Identifiers

PMID37243863
PMCPMC10272269
OpenAlexW4378530881

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.