ArticlePediatric cardiology2024
Coarctation Angioplasty in Young Children: Does IMPACT Registry Data Accurately Reflect Clinical Outcomes?
Article in Pediatric cardiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Balloon angioplasty for recoarctation of the aorta is routinely performed in young children and is considered successful when the systolic gradient is reduced to < 10 mmHg. IMPACT defines acute procedural success solely based on a final gradient of < 10 mmHg and stratifies participating institutions based on these acute outcomes. Between February 2012 and December 2020, IMPACT data was analyzed for 110 coarctation interventions. Electronic medical records were reviewed, and primary endpoints were one of the following: (1) final analysis end date (June 2021), (2) patient death, or (3) most recent transcatheter or surgical reintervention. 64 (58.2%) interventions had a post-procedure CA gradient < 10 mmHg. Comparison of clinical patient outcome for acute success demonstrated no significant relationship using IMPACT (p = 0.70) criteria. There was no statistically significant difference between clinical success and failure for: pre- and post-treatment systolic gradients; absolute or percent change in systolic gradient; and pre-treatment aorta diameter. Clinical outcome and patient age did show a significant difference (p = 0.0093) with better clinical outcomes in older patients. Our analysis did not reveal a statistically significant difference between IMPACT criteria for successful treatment of CA and clinical outcome. These findings underscore a need to identify other clinical metrics that better predict outcome following CA balloon angioplasty treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
37243748What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.