Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37243736›Full record

ArticleInternational archives of occupational and environmental health2023

Bioaerosol-induced in vitro activation of toll-like receptors and inflammatory biomarker expression in waste workers.

Elke Eriksen, Anani Komlavi Afanou, Anne Straumfors, Pål Graff

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International archives of occupational and environmental health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Air Quality Monitoring Using Low-Cost Sensors in Urban Areas of Jodhpur, Rajasthan.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Elke EriksenSTAMI, National Institute of Occupational Health, Gydas Vei 8, 0363, Oslo, Norway. elke.eriksen@stami.no.ORCID 0000-0002-9868-1347
Anani Komlavi AfanouSTAMI, National Institute of Occupational Health, Gydas Vei 8, 0363, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0001-6140-7312
Anne StraumforsSTAMI, National Institute of Occupational Health, Gydas Vei 8, 0363, Oslo, Norway.
Pål GraffSTAMI, National Institute of Occupational Health, Gydas Vei 8, 0363, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0003-4928-617X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeOccupational exposure to bioaerosols during waste handling remains a health concern for exposed workers. However, exposure-related health effects and underlying immunological mechanisms are still poorly described.

methodsThe present study assessed the inflammatory potential of work-air samples (n = 56) in vitro and investigated biomarker expression in exposed workers (n = 69) compared to unexposed controls (n = 25). These quantitative results were compared to self-reported health conditions.

resultsPersonal air samples provoked an activation of TLR2 and TLR4 HEK reporter cells in one-third of all samples, indicating that the work environment contained ligands capable of inducing an immune response in vitro. Monocyte levels, as well as plasma biomarker levels, such as IL-1Ra, IL-18 and TNFα were significantly higher in exposed workers, compared to the control group when confounding factors such as BMI, sex, age and smoking habits were accounted for. Furthermore, a significant exposure-related increase in midweek IL-8 levels was measured among exposed workers. Tendencies of increased prevalence of health effects of the respiratory tract were identified in exposed workers.

conclusionInhalable dust provoked TLR activation in vitro, indicating that an exposure-related immune response may be expected in susceptible workers. However, despite significant differences in inflammatory plasma biomarker levels between exposed and unexposed workers, prevalence of self-reported health effects did not differ between the groups. This may be due to the healthy worker effect, or other factors such as adequate use of personal protective respiratory devices or adaptation to the work environment with reduced activation of the immune system.

Indexed as

Occupational ExposureBiomarkersDustHumansSmokingToll-Like ReceptorsBiomarkersDustToll-Like ReceptorsBioaerosolsBiomarkersHealth effectsOccupational exposureSymptomsTLR2TLR4Waste sorting

Identifiers

PMID37243736
PMCPMC10361871

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.